rs2228213
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_002114.4(HIVEP1):c.4827G>A(p.Met1609Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.323 in 1,613,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87,650 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002114.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIVEP1 | NM_002114.4 | c.4827G>A | p.Met1609Ile | missense_variant | 4/9 | ENST00000379388.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIVEP1 | ENST00000379388.7 | c.4827G>A | p.Met1609Ile | missense_variant | 4/9 | 1 | NM_002114.4 | P2 | |
HIVEP1 | ENST00000541134.5 | c.4827G>A | p.Met1609Ile | missense_variant | 4/9 | 5 | A2 | ||
HIVEP1 | ENST00000627968.2 | c.-1477G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 4/8 | 5 | ||||
HIVEP1 | ENST00000442081.6 | c.166+4688G>A | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.263 AC: 39975AN: 151990Hom.: 6165 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.300 AC: 74761AN: 249464Hom.: 12109 AF XY: 0.305 AC XY: 41329AN XY: 135348
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.330 AC: 481654AN: 1461602Hom.: 81493 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.329 AC XY: 239101AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.263 AC: 39963AN: 152108Hom.: 6157 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.260 AC XY: 19337AN XY: 74350
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at