Menu
GeneBe

rs2228501

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000289.6(PFKM):c.246G>A(p.Thr82=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0795 in 1,611,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,024 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.060 ( 361 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.082 ( 5663 hom. )

Consequence

PFKM
NM_000289.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
PFKM (HGNC:8877): (phosphofructokinase, muscle) Three phosphofructokinase isozymes exist in humans: muscle, liver and platelet. These isozymes function as subunits of the mammalian tetramer phosphofructokinase, which catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Tetramer composition varies depending on tissue type. This gene encodes the muscle-type isozyme. Mutations in this gene have been associated with glycogen storage disease type VII, also known as Tarui disease. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
MIR6505 (HGNC:50104): (microRNA 6505) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 12-48132876-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-48132876-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255759.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.091 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PFKMNM_000289.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.246G>A p.Thr82= synonymous_variant 5/23 ENST00000359794.11
MIR6505NR_106760.1 linkuse as main transcript downstream_gene_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PFKMENST00000359794.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.246G>A p.Thr82= synonymous_variant 5/231 NM_000289.6 P1P08237-1
MIR6505ENST00000617206.1 linkuse as main transcript downstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0598
AC:
9099
AN:
152116
Hom.:
361
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0408
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000964
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0839
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00955
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0929
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0540
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0571
AC:
14072
AN:
246558
Hom.:
590
AF XY:
0.0572
AC XY:
7619
AN XY:
133240
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0157
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0827
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0904
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0581
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0816
AC:
119092
AN:
1459330
Hom.:
5663
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0795
AC XY:
57689
AN XY:
725796
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0836
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0959
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0688
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0598
AC:
9101
AN:
152234
Hom.:
361
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0582
AC XY:
4329
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0408
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000966
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0839
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0929
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0534
Alfa
AF:
0.0719
Hom.:
275
Bravo
AF:
0.0532
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
44
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type VII Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 27, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 21, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 26, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
Cadd
Benign
9.0
Dann
Benign
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.24
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.24
Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2228501; hg19: chr12-48526659; API