rs2228525

Variant names:

• chr10-49472913-G-A
• rs2228525
• NM_000124.4:c.2825C>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr10-49472913-G-A
• chr10-49472913-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):​c.2825C>T​(p.Thr942Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00289 in 1,613,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 88 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 (47 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 (41 hom.)
• Consequence: ERCC6 NM_000124.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 6.89

Genes affected

ERCC6 (HGNC:3438): (ERCC excision repair 6, chromatin remodeling factor) This gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is important in transcription-coupled excision repair. The encoded protein has ATP-stimulated ATPase activity, interacts with several transcription and excision repair proteins, and may promote complex formation at DNA repair sites. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cockayne syndrome type B and cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1. Alternative splicing occurs between a splice site from exon 5 of this gene to the 3' splice site upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of the adjacent gene, piggyback-derived-3 (GeneID:267004), which activates the alternative polyadenylation site downstream of the piggyback-derived-3 ORF. The resulting transcripts encode a fusion protein that shares sequence with the product of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

ENSG00000235939 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015826166).
• BP6: Variant 10-49472913-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49472913-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255165.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-49472913-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.05 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC6	NM_000124.4	c.2825C>T	p.Thr942Met	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 21	ENST00000355832.10	NP_000115.1
ERCC6	NM_001346440.2	c.2825C>T	p.Thr942Met	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 21		NP_001333369.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ERCC6	ENST00000355832.10	c.2825C>T	p.Thr942Met	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 21	1	NM_000124.4	ENSP00000348089.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0146 AC: 2213 AN: 152080 Hom.: 47 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0493

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00779

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00317

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000338

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0100

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00395 AC: 991 AN: 250968 Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.00303 AC XY: 411 AN XY: 135626

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0493

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00336

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00308

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000982

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000203

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00261

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00167 AC: 2435 AN: 1461630 Hom.: 41 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00144 AC XY: 1050 AN XY: 727110

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0521

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00369

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00279

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000159

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00401

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0146 AC: 2223 AN: 152198 Hom.: 47 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0138 AC XY: 1028 AN XY: 74412

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0494

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00778

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00317

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000338

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00992

Alfa AF: 0.00257 Hom.: 20

Bravo AF: 0.0170

TwinsUK AF: 0.000270 AC: 1

ALSPAC AF: 0.000259 AC: 1

ESP6500AA AF: 0.0488 AC: 215

ESP6500EA AF: 0.000465 AC: 4

ExAC AF: 0.00506 AC: 614

Asia WGS AF: 0.00549 AC: 19 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000600

EpiControl AF: 0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 11, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21085059) -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2

Dec 10, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Age related macular degeneration 5 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cockayne syndrome type 2 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.095
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.33	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.21
CADD	Uncertain	25
DANN	Benign	0.94
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.29	T
Eigen	Benign	-0.26
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.19
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.98	D
LIST_S2	Uncertain	0.89	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.016	T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.92	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	-0.96	N
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.78	T
PROVEAN	Uncertain	-3.2	D
REVEL	Uncertain	0.35
Sift	Benign	0.25	T
Sift4G	Benign	0.28	T
Polyphen		0.99	D
Vest4		0.37
MVP		0.66
MPC		0.17
ClinPred		0.039	T
GERP RS		3.9
Varity_R		0.067
gMVP		0.73

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2228525; hg19: chr10-50680959; COSMIC: COSV100876368; COSMIC: COSV100876368;