rs2229020
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):āc.3383A>Gā(p.Gln1128Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00113 in 1,611,350 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.3383A>G | p.Gln1128Arg | missense_variant | 23/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.3383A>G | p.Gln1128Arg | missense_variant | 23/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00594 AC: 904AN: 152212Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00174 AC: 436AN: 250902Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00133 AC XY: 180AN XY: 135616
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000630 AC: 919AN: 1459020Hom.: 12 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000537 AC XY: 390AN XY: 725960
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00595 AC: 906AN: 152330Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00615 AC XY: 458AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 29, 2016 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 12, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 17, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 11, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 16, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17333338, 20981092, 22529920, 11996792, 24728327, 25122203, 22071889, 21933854) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 28, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 22, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 20, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 30, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 05, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 14, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 18, 2022 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Gln1128Arg variant was identified in 8 of 9204 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.000869) from individuals or families with breast cancer, CLL, Ataxia telangiectasia and was present in 2 of 5218 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) from healthy individuals (Austen 2005, Jacquemin 2011, Skowronska 2012, Tavtigian 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2229020) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by GenDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae), Clinvitae (classified as benign by ClinVar, Invitae), Cosmic (pathogenic), MutDB, databases. The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0, ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 601(8 homozygous) of 276616 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 528 of 24022 chromosomes (freq: 0.022). The p.Gln1128 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant is located with the Armadillo-type fold functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at