rs2229194

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000751.3(CHRND):​c.1105C>T​(p.Pro369Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0032 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P369R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

CHRND
NM_000751.3 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.52

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRND (HGNC:1965): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic delta subunit) The acetylcholine receptor of muscle has 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha and 1 each of beta, gamma and delta subunits. After acetylcholine binding, the receptor undergoes an extensive conformation change that affects all subunits and leads to opening of an ion-conducting channel across the plasma membrane. Defects in this gene are a cause of multiple pterygium syndrome lethal type (MUPSL), congenital myasthenic syndrome slow-channel type (SCCMS), and congenital myasthenic syndrome fast-channel type (FCCMS). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2015]
CHRND Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 3A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 3B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 3C
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0058621466).
BP6
Variant 2-232533988-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232533988-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 193603.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00293 (447/152362) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00621 (95/15310). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0052. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 229 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHRNDNM_000751.3 linkc.1105C>T p.Pro369Ser missense_variant Exon 10 of 12 ENST00000258385.8 NP_000742.1 Q07001-1
CHRNDNM_001256657.2 linkc.1060C>T p.Pro354Ser missense_variant Exon 9 of 11 NP_001243586.1 Q07001-2
CHRNDNM_001311196.2 linkc.802C>T p.Pro268Ser missense_variant Exon 10 of 12 NP_001298125.1 Q07001
CHRNDNM_001311195.2 linkc.523C>T p.Pro175Ser missense_variant Exon 8 of 10 NP_001298124.1 Q07001B4E3W4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHRNDENST00000258385.8 linkc.1105C>T p.Pro369Ser missense_variant Exon 10 of 12 1 NM_000751.3 ENSP00000258385.3 Q07001-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00294
AC:
448
AN:
152244
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00621
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00725
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00351
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00340
AC:
854
AN:
251092
AF XY:
0.00330
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000497
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00832
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00408
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00323
AC:
4725
AN:
1461452
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00312
AC XY:
2270
AN XY:
727032
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
13
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00353
AC:
158
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000918
AC:
24
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86240
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00713
AC:
379
AN:
53186
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000709
AC:
4
AN:
5638
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00356
AC:
3962
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00305
AC:
184
AN:
60362
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
318
636
954
1272
1590
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
138
276
414
552
690
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00293
AC:
447
AN:
152362
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00307
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000601
AC:
25
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00621
AC:
95
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00725
AC:
77
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00351
AC:
239
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00426
AC:
9
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
42
64
85
106
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00322
Hom.:
14
Bravo
AF:
0.00255
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00351
AC:
13
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00349
AC:
30
ExAC
AF:
0.00337
AC:
409
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00316
EpiControl
AF:
0.00356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CHRND: BS2 -

Dec 23, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome 3A Uncertain:1
Feb 25, 2019
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PP3,BP6. -

not specified Benign:1
Jan 06, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.60
.;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.027
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.47
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.032
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0059
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.14
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
.;L
PhyloP100
1.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.2
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.059
T;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.044
D;D
Polyphen
0.93
.;P
Vest4
0.30
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.31
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.45
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229194; hg19: chr2-233398698; API