rs2229249

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000016.6(ACADM):c.678A>G(p.Ala226Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000888 in 1,613,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

ACADM
NM_000016.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.165

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACADM (HGNC:89): (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase medium chain) This gene encodes the medium-chain specific (C4 to C12 straight chain) acyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase. The homotetramer enzyme catalyzes the initial step of the mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway. Defects in this gene cause medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, a disease characterized by hepatic dysfunction, fasting hypoglycemia, and encephalopathy, which can result in infantile death. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACADM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Orphanet

ACADM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 1-75745884-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-75745884-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226082.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.165 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000857 (1252/1461100) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0269 (1204/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0257. There are 24 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 544 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACADM	NM_000016.6 link	c.678A>G	p.Ala226Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 12	ENST00000370841.9	NP_000007.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ACADM	ENST00000370841.9 link	c.678A>G	p.Ala226Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 12	1	NM_000016.6	ENSP00000359878.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00118

AC:

179

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00423

AC:

1064

AN:

251324

AF XY:

0.00332

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000432

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0302

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00229

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000857

AC:

1252

AN:

1461100

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000748

AC XY:

544

AN XY:

726922

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0269

AC:

1204

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26118

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39644

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86240

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53366

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000810

AC:

AN:

1111410

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000547

AC:

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

155

232

310

387

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00119

AC:

181

AN:

152338

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00122

AC XY:

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0110

AC:

169

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.525

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00131

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00248

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency

Benign:4

Feb 20, 2015

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 23, 2017

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 20, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 04, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The ACADM c.678A>G (p.Ala226Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synoymous change and 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may alter ESE binding. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 1061/277140 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.029955 (1031/34418, 21 homozygotes). This frequency is about 6 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ACADM variant (0.0054233), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publication. Taken together, this variant is classified as "benign." -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 18, 2018

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Feb 17, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

ACADM-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 17, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

7.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

-0.17

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over