rs2229320

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000246.4(CIITA):​c.2394G>A​(p.Pro798Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.206 in 1,600,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35,800 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P798P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2609 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 33191 hom. )

Consequence

CIITA
NM_000246.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.40

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CIITA (HGNC:7067): (class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator) This gene encodes a protein with an acidic transcriptional activation domain, 4 LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) and a GTP binding domain. The protein is located in the nucleus and acts as a positive regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription, and is referred to as the "master control factor" for the expression of these genes. The protein also binds GTP and uses GTP binding to facilitate its own transport into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus it does not bind DNA but rather uses an intrinsic acetyltransferase (AT) activity to act in a coactivator-like fashion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bare lymphocyte syndrome type II (also known as hereditary MHC class II deficiency or HLA class II-deficient combined immunodeficiency), increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and possibly myocardial infarction. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2013]
CIITA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • MHC class II deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 16-10907886-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-10907886-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 317710.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.4 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.289 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CIITANM_000246.4 linkc.2394G>A p.Pro798Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 20 ENST00000324288.14 NP_000237.2 P33076A0A0B4J1S1Q66X48

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CIITAENST00000324288.14 linkc.2394G>A p.Pro798Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 20 1 NM_000246.4 ENSP00000316328.8 A0A0B4J1S1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.167
AC:
25467
AN:
152108
Hom.:
2606
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0491
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.324
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.159
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.210
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.301
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.285
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.254
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.161
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.205
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.176
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.211
AC:
49961
AN:
236446
AF XY:
0.219
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0448
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.224
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.314
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.264
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.209
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.210
AC:
303453
AN:
1447984
Hom.:
33191
Cov.:
82
AF XY:
0.212
AC XY:
152615
AN XY:
719124
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0425
AC:
1401
AN:
32956
American (AMR)
AF:
0.147
AC:
6353
AN:
43352
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.217
AC:
5432
AN:
25056
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.295
AC:
11663
AN:
39558
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.280
AC:
23576
AN:
84250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.253
AC:
13287
AN:
52552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.235
AC:
1328
AN:
5662
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.207
AC:
228564
AN:
1104866
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.198
AC:
11849
AN:
59732
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15855
31710
47565
63420
79275
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8080
16160
24240
32320
40400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.167
AC:
25470
AN:
152226
Hom.:
2609
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.171
AC XY:
12745
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0490
AC:
2039
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.159
AC:
2428
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.210
AC:
728
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.302
AC:
1557
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.285
AC:
1377
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.254
AC:
2682
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.167
AC:
49
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.205
AC:
13948
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.174
AC:
367
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1070
2141
3211
4282
5352
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
304
608
912
1216
1520
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.183
Hom.:
1325
Bravo
AF:
0.154
Asia WGS
AF:
0.219
AC:
764
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MHC class II deficiency Benign:4
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.055
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-3.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229320; hg19: chr16-11001743; COSMIC: COSV60853804; API