rs2229817
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):c.5270C>T(p.Thr1757Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00488 in 1,613,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 211 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1757T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000093.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL5A1 | NM_000093.5 | c.5270C>T | p.Thr1757Met | missense_variant | 65/66 | ENST00000371817.8 | NP_000084.3 | |
COL5A1 | NM_001278074.1 | c.5270C>T | p.Thr1757Met | missense_variant | 65/66 | NP_001265003.1 | ||
LOC101448202 | NR_103451.2 | n.71-14895G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL5A1 | ENST00000371817.8 | c.5270C>T | p.Thr1757Met | missense_variant | 65/66 | 1 | NM_000093.5 | ENSP00000360882.3 | ||
COL5A1 | ENST00000371820.4 | c.5270C>T | p.Thr1757Met | missense_variant | 65/66 | 2 | ENSP00000360885.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00505 AC: 768AN: 152212Hom.: 27 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0120 AC: 3016AN: 250710Hom.: 71 AF XY: 0.0117 AC XY: 1588AN XY: 135740
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00486 AC: 7105AN: 1461394Hom.: 185 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00529 AC XY: 3849AN XY: 727046
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00504 AC: 768AN: 152330Hom.: 26 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00569 AC XY: 424AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 23, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 01, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 15, 2017 | Variant summary: The COL5A1 c.5270C>T (p.Thr1757Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 1444/119592 control chromosomes (24 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0120744, which is approximately 9660 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic COL5A1 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, based on the prevalence in general population this variant is classified as benign. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Fibromuscular dysplasia, multifocal Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 23, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jul 16, 2022 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at