Menu
GeneBe

rs2230244

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1173C>T(p.Asp391=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00481 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 324 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 160 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 164 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 19-50403528-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50403528-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380706.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50403528-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.23 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0844 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1173C>T p.Asp391= synonymous_variant 10/27 ENST00000440232.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1173C>T p.Asp391= synonymous_variant 10/271 NM_002691.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0253
AC:
3857
AN:
152200
Hom.:
159
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0867
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0182
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00698
AC:
1756
AN:
251472
Hom.:
67
AF XY:
0.00501
AC XY:
681
AN XY:
135910
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0904
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00642
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000343
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00375
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00267
AC:
3896
AN:
1461720
Hom.:
164
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00228
AC XY:
1658
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00686
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000161
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00626
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0254
AC:
3873
AN:
152318
Hom.:
160
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0247
AC XY:
1839
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0868
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0180
Alfa
AF:
0.0168
Hom.:
38
Bravo
AF:
0.0295
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 13, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 06, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 14, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 20, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 26, 2016Variant summary: The POLD1 c.1173C>T (p.Asp391Asp) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation Taster predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 999/121398 control chromosomes (42 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0874495 (910/10406). This frequency is about 6156 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this is a common benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 25, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 20, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The POLD1 p.Asp391= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2230244) “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano), and in control databases in 2422 (97 homozygous) of 277198 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 2125 (97 homozygous) of 24026 chromosomes (freq: 0.09), Other in 25 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 230 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), European Non-Finnish in 39 of 126692 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European Finnish in 1 of 25792 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 1 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Asp391= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
Cadd
Benign
0.44
Dann
Benign
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230244; hg19: chr19-50906785; COSMIC: COSV70956594; COSMIC: COSV70956594; API