rs2230246

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):​c.1539G>A​(p.Leu513=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00798 in 1,613,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 852 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.042 ( 432 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 420 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.202
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 19-50407027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50407027-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380636.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50407027-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.202 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.14 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1539G>A p.Leu513= synonymous_variant 13/27 ENST00000440232.7 NP_002682.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1539G>A p.Leu513= synonymous_variant 13/271 NM_002691.4 ENSP00000406046 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0415
AC:
6310
AN:
151960
Hom.:
428
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.143
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0330
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0113
AC:
2822
AN:
250286
Hom.:
182
AF XY:
0.00832
AC XY:
1126
AN XY:
135316
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00934
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00319
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000638
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00671
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00447
AC:
6535
AN:
1461258
Hom.:
420
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00392
AC XY:
2852
AN XY:
726960
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000394
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0103
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0416
AC:
6334
AN:
152078
Hom.:
432
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0403
AC XY:
2998
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0327
Alfa
AF:
0.0223
Hom.:
86
Bravo
AF:
0.0480
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
36
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 10, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 13, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 06, 2016- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 18, 2016Variant summary: The POLD1 c.1539G>A (p.Leu513Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 1638/120246 control chromosomes (including 116 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.1437984 (1484/10320). This frequency is about 10123 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this is a common benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 20, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 25, 2017- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The POLD1 p.Leu513= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2230246) “With Benign allele”, and in control databases in 3896 (256 homozygous) of 276006 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.01 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 3409 (250 homozygous) of 23968 chromosomes (freq: 0.14), Other in 42 of 6446 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), Latino in 328 (5 homozygous) of 34406 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European Non-Finnish in 76 (1 homozygous) of 125746 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Ashkenazi Jewish in 32 of 10128 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), and South Asian in 9 of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while not observed in the East Asian and European Finnish populations. The p.Leu513= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
8.2
DANN
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230246; hg19: chr19-50910284; API