rs2230246

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):​c.1539G>A​(p.Leu513Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00798 in 1,613,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 852 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L513L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.042 ( 432 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 420 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.202

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
POLD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLD1-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • mandibular hypoplasia-deafness-progeroid syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • immunodeficiency 120
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • non-severe combined immunodeficiency due to polymerase delta deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 19-50407027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50407027-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 380636.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.202 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.14 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkc.1539G>A p.Leu513Leu synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 ENST00000440232.7 NP_002682.2 P28340A0A024R4F4Q59FA0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkc.1539G>A p.Leu513Leu synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 27 1 NM_002691.4 ENSP00000406046.1 P28340

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0415
AC:
6310
AN:
151960
Hom.:
428
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.143
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0330
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0113
AC:
2822
AN:
250286
AF XY:
0.00832
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00934
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00319
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000638
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00671
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00447
AC:
6535
AN:
1461258
Hom.:
420
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00392
AC XY:
2852
AN XY:
726960
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.149
AC:
4976
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
465
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00310
AC:
81
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000394
AC:
34
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52962
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0110
AC:
63
AN:
5748
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
295
AN:
1111918
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0103
AC:
621
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
274
548
823
1097
1371
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
154
308
462
616
770
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0416
AC:
6334
AN:
152078
Hom.:
432
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0403
AC XY:
2998
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.143
AC:
5931
AN:
41418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
275
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000622
AC:
3
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000617
AC:
42
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0327
AC:
69
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
265
530
795
1060
1325
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
66
132
198
264
330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0235
Hom.:
91
Bravo
AF:
0.0480
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
36
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 06, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:3
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Oct 25, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 20, 2025
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The synonymous variant NM_001308632.1(POLD1):c.1539G>A (p.Leu513=) has been reported to ClinVar as Benign with a status of (2 stars) criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts (Variation ID 380636 as of 2025-01-02). The p.Leu513= variant is observed in 238/5,008 (4.7524%) alleles from individuals of 1kG All background in 1kG, indicating it is a common benign variant. The p.Leu513= variant is not predicted to disrupt an existing splice site. The p.Leu513= variant results in a substitution of a base that is not predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Benign -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 18, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The POLD1 c.1539G>A (p.Leu513Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 1638/120246 control chromosomes (including 116 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.1437984 (1484/10320). This frequency is about 10123 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this is a common benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLD1 p.Leu513= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2230246) “With Benign allele”, and in control databases in 3896 (256 homozygous) of 276006 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.01 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 3409 (250 homozygous) of 23968 chromosomes (freq: 0.14), Other in 42 of 6446 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), Latino in 328 (5 homozygous) of 34406 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European Non-Finnish in 76 (1 homozygous) of 125746 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Ashkenazi Jewish in 32 of 10128 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), and South Asian in 9 of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while not observed in the East Asian and European Finnish populations. The p.Leu513= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
8.2
DANN
Benign
0.59
PhyloP100
0.20
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230246; hg19: chr19-50910284; API