rs2232638

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_206937.2(LIG4):​c.807C>T​(p.Tyr269Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00557 in 1,613,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 463 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.030 ( 240 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 223 hom. )

Consequence

LIG4
NM_206937.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.43

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LIG4 (HGNC:6601): (DNA ligase 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a DNA ligase that joins single-strand breaks in a double-stranded polydeoxynucleotide in an ATP-dependent reaction. This protein is essential for V(D)J recombination and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair through nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). This protein forms a complex with the X-ray repair cross complementing protein 4 (XRCC4), and further interacts with the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). Both XRCC4 and DNA-PK are known to be required for NHEJ. The crystal structure of the complex formed by this protein and XRCC4 has been resolved. Defects in this gene are the cause of LIG4 syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been observed. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
LIG4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • DNA ligase IV deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
  • Dubowitz syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Omenn syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 13-108210462-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-108210462-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 310988.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.103 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206937.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LIG4
NM_206937.2
MANE Select
c.807C>Tp.Tyr269Tyr
synonymous
Exon 3 of 3NP_996820.1
LIG4
NM_001352604.2
c.843C>Tp.Tyr281Tyr
synonymous
Exon 3 of 3NP_001339533.1
LIG4
NM_001098268.2
c.807C>Tp.Tyr269Tyr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 2NP_001091738.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LIG4
ENST00000442234.6
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.807C>Tp.Tyr269Tyr
synonymous
Exon 3 of 3ENSP00000402030.1
LIG4
ENST00000405925.2
TSL:1
c.807C>Tp.Tyr269Tyr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 2ENSP00000385955.1
LIG4
ENST00000611712.4
TSL:4
c.807C>Tp.Tyr269Tyr
synonymous
Exon 3 of 3ENSP00000484288.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0300
AC:
4567
AN:
152132
Hom.:
237
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.105
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0220
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00766
AC:
1916
AN:
250260
AF XY:
0.00551
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00469
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00312
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00300
AC:
4380
AN:
1460920
Hom.:
223
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00254
AC XY:
1843
AN XY:
726774
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.108
AC:
3614
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00512
AC:
229
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
11
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52732
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00399
AC:
23
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000890
AC:
99
AN:
1111814
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00669
AC:
404
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
225
450
674
899
1124
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0302
AC:
4602
AN:
152250
Hom.:
240
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0298
AC XY:
2219
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.105
AC:
4367
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
171
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000206
AC:
14
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
46
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
212
425
637
850
1062
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0166
Hom.:
73
Bravo
AF:
0.0342
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00895
AC:
31
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

DNA ligase IV deficiency Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Severe combined immunodeficiency due to DCLRE1C deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
4.6
DANN
Benign
0.47
PhyloP100
5.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2232638; hg19: chr13-108862810; API