Menu
GeneBe

rs2233331

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006096.4(NDRG1):c.507G>A(p.Ala169=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 38 hom. )

Consequence

NDRG1
NM_006096.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDRG1 (HGNC:7679): (N-myc downstream regulated 1) This gene is a member of the N-myc downregulated gene family which belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. The protein encoded by this gene is a cytoplasmic protein involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation. The encoded protein is necessary for p53-mediated caspase activation and apoptosis. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D, and expression of this gene may be a prognostic indicator for several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 8-133256807-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-133256807-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 219798.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-133256807-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.28 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0114 (1738/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0396 (1647/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.038. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 812 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 29 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NDRG1NM_006096.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.507G>A p.Ala169= synonymous_variant 8/16 ENST00000323851.13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NDRG1ENST00000323851.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.507G>A p.Ala169= synonymous_variant 8/161 NM_006096.4 P1Q92597-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0114
AC:
1730
AN:
152216
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00291
AC:
731
AN:
251158
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00209
AC XY:
284
AN XY:
135738
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000969
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00118
AC:
1721
AN:
1461852
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00101
AC XY:
737
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0424
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000710
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00214
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0114
AC:
1738
AN:
152334
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
812
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0396
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00615
Alfa
AF:
0.00638
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0124
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 24, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJan 08, 2020- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 13, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
NDRG1-related condition Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 04, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
Cadd
Benign
0.81
Dann
Benign
0.77
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2233331; hg19: chr8-134269050; API