rs2233853

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001025603.2(RFX5):c.900C>T(p.Leu300Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 1,611,864 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0081 ( 20 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

RFX5
NM_001025603.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.96

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RFX5 (HGNC:9986): (regulatory factor X5) A lack of MHC-II expression results in a severe immunodeficiency syndrome called MHC-II deficiency, or the bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS; MIM 209920). At least 4 complementation groups have been identified in B-cell lines established from patients with BLS. The molecular defects in complementation groups B, C, and D all lead to a deficiency in RFX, a nuclear protein complex that binds to the X box of MHC-II promoters. The lack of RFX binding activity in complementation group C results from mutations in the RFX5 gene encoding the 75-kD subunit of RFX (Steimle et al., 1995). RFX5 is the fifth member of the growing family of DNA-binding proteins sharing a novel and highly characteristic DNA-binding domain called the RFX motif. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found but the full-length natures of only two have been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RFX5 links:

RFX5-AS1 (HGNC:40503): (RFX5 antisense RNA 1)

RFX5-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 1-151343137-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-151343137-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 471258.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.96 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00809 (1232/152336) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.028 (1163/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0266. There are 20 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 568 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 20 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RFX5	NM_001025603.2 link	c.900C>T	p.Leu300Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 11	ENST00000452671.7	NP_001020774.1	P48382-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RFX5	ENST00000452671.7 link	c.900C>T	p.Leu300Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 11	1	NM_001025603.2	ENSP00000389130.2		P48382-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00807

AC:

1228

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0280

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00574

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00192

AC:

473

AN:

245866

AF XY:

0.00138

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0279

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000497

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000807

AC:

1178

AN:

1459528

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000707

AC XY:

513

AN XY:

726002

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0281

AC:

938

AN:

33440

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000928

AC:

AN:

86188

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52470

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

4618

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000387

AC:

AN:

1111996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00202

AC:

122

AN:

60256

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

155

233

310

388

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00809

AC:

1232

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00762

AC XY:

568

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0280

AC:

1163

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00333

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00568

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

122

184

245

306

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00482

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00969

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00375

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MHC class II deficiency

Benign:3

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.20

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.77

PhyloP100

-2.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over