rs2233920
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001243787.2(SMUG1):c.44G>T(p.Gly15Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 1,604,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 164 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001243787.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMUG1 | NM_001243787.2 | c.44G>T | p.Gly15Val | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000682136.1 | NP_001230716.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMUG1 | ENST00000682136.1 | c.44G>T | p.Gly15Val | missense_variant | 3/4 | NM_001243787.2 | ENSP00000507590 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0164 AC: 2500AN: 152128Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00425 AC: 988AN: 232400Hom.: 32 AF XY: 0.00309 AC XY: 389AN XY: 125774
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00159 AC: 2308AN: 1452334Hom.: 83 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00135 AC XY: 972AN XY: 721388
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0165 AC: 2507AN: 152246Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0157 AC XY: 1167AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 06, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at