rs2234583

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.609C>T​(p.Asn203Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0766 in 1,612,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,857 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.13 ( 1987 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.071 ( 4870 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.877

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Denys-Drash syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
  • Wilms tumor 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Frasier syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 11-32434752-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32434752-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign. Clinvar id is 261713.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.877 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.281 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkc.609C>T p.Asn203Asn synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 ENST00000452863.10 NP_077744.4 P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkc.609C>T p.Asn203Asn synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 10 1 NM_024426.6 ENSP00000415516.5 P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.127
AC:
19344
AN:
152174
Hom.:
1987
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.286
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0817
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0730
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00963
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0683
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0551
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.193
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0692
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.116
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0755
AC:
18488
AN:
244874
AF XY:
0.0725
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.290
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0504
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0868
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00253
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0532
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0685
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0744
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0713
AC:
104150
AN:
1460478
Hom.:
4870
Cov.:
43
AF XY:
0.0713
AC XY:
51825
AN XY:
726566
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.291
AC:
9749
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0548
AC:
2447
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0857
AC:
2237
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0223
AC:
887
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0791
AC:
6820
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0527
AC:
2755
AN:
52306
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.114
AC:
656
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0663
AC:
73771
AN:
1111856
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0800
AC:
4828
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6943
13885
20828
27770
34713
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2788
5576
8364
11152
13940
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.127
AC:
19370
AN:
152290
Hom.:
1987
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.125
AC XY:
9332
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.285
AC:
11863
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0816
AC:
1249
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0730
AC:
253
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00966
AC:
50
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0683
AC:
330
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0551
AC:
585
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.192
AC:
56
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0692
AC:
4709
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.113
AC:
239
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
837
1673
2510
3346
4183
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
194
388
582
776
970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0979
Hom.:
910
Bravo
AF:
0.134
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0490
AC:
172
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0727
EpiControl
AF:
0.0729

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:4
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Mar 28, 2019
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Apr 26, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 16, 2021
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meacham syndrome Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
May 26, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The WT1 c.594C>T (p.Asn198Asn) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant along with 4/5 in silico splice prediction tools predicting the variant not to have an impact on splicing. This variant was found in 9132/113272 control chromosomes (598 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation (366 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2917204 (2713/9300). This frequency greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic WT1 variant (0.0000094), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Oct 28, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Frasier syndrome Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Drash syndrome Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

WT1-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 02, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
9.4
DANN
Benign
0.97
PhyloP100
0.88

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2234583; hg19: chr11-32456298; COSMIC: COSV60069793; COSMIC: COSV60069793; API