rs2234938
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000052.7(ATP7A):c.4390A>G(p.Ile1464Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00117 in 1,209,457 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. There are 415 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1464K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000052.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7A | NM_000052.7 | c.4390A>G | p.Ile1464Val | missense_variant | 23/23 | ENST00000341514.11 | |
ATP7A | NM_001282224.2 | c.4156A>G | p.Ile1386Val | missense_variant | 22/22 | ||
ATP7A | NR_104109.2 | n.1563A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7A | ENST00000341514.11 | c.4390A>G | p.Ile1464Val | missense_variant | 23/23 | 1 | NM_000052.7 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000988 AC: 110AN: 111382Hom.: 2 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000745 AC XY: 25AN XY: 33556
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 249AN: 183415Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000958 AC XY: 65AN XY: 67877
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00118 AC: 1300AN: 1098020Hom.: 25 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 389AN XY: 363380
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000996 AC: 111AN: 111437Hom.: 2 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000773 AC XY: 26AN XY: 33621
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 23, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 10, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Menkes kinky-hair syndrome;C0268353:Cutis laxa, X-linked;C1845359:X-linked distal spinal muscular atrophy type 3 Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 26, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 28, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | May 01, 2020 | - - |
ATP7A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 16, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at