rs2235000
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.1541G>A(p.Gly514Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00324 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 143 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G514C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.1541G>A | p.Gly514Asp | missense_variant | 10/63 | ENST00000675843.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.1541G>A | p.Gly514Asp | missense_variant | 10/63 | NM_000051.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0172 AC: 2616AN: 152136Hom.: 69 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00441 AC: 1108AN: 251138Hom.: 31 AF XY: 0.00296 AC XY: 402AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00178 AC: 2605AN: 1461860Hom.: 75 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00152 AC XY: 1103AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0172 AC: 2619AN: 152254Hom.: 68 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0168 AC XY: 1252AN XY: 74444
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 12, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 29, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 25, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 05, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 06, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Feb 04, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Nov 14, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 21, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 24, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 07, 2021 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Gly514Asp variant was identified in 4 of 4396 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from individuals or families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 6 of 2399 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0025) from healthy individuals (Tavtigian 2009, Teraoka 2001, Thorstenson 2001). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2235000) as “with other allele”. The variant was not identified in ClinVar, Clinvitae, Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, or ATM-LOVD databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1603 of 277074 chromosomes (41 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005785 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1456 (41 homozygous) of 24022 chromosomes (freq: 0.06061), Other in 20 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.003097), Latino in 101 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.002935), European (Non-Finnish) in 18 of 126604 chromosomes (freq: 0.000142), and SouthA sian in 8 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.00026). while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish) populations. The p.Gly514Asp residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at