rs2235371
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.820G>A(p.Val274Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.037 in 1,614,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,385 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.045 ( 802 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.036 ( 5583 hom. )
Consequence
IRF6
NM_006147.4 missense
NM_006147.4 missense
Scores
1
10
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.84
Genes affected
IRF6 (HGNC:6121): (interferon regulatory factor 6) This gene encodes a member of the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF) family. Family members share a highly-conserved N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain and a less conserved C-terminal protein-binding domain. The encoded protein may be a transcriptional activator. Mutations in this gene can cause van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also associated with non-syndromic orofacial cleft type 6. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), IRF6. . Gene score misZ 2.7435 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.8897 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to, van der Woude syndrome, autosomal dominant popliteal pterygium syndrome, tooth agenesis, van der Woude syndrome 1.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0020831823).
BP6
Variant 1-209790735-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-209790735-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259928.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.392 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF6 | NM_006147.4 | c.820G>A | p.Val274Ile | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000367021.8 | NP_006138.1 | |
IRF6 | NM_001206696.2 | c.535G>A | p.Val179Ile | missense_variant | 5/7 | NP_001193625.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF6 | ENST00000367021.8 | c.820G>A | p.Val274Ile | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_006147.4 | ENSP00000355988 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0447 AC: 6800AN: 152176Hom.: 797 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6800
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0867 AC: 21729AN: 250644Hom.: 3073 AF XY: 0.0783 AC XY: 10603AN XY: 135492
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
21729
AN:
250644
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
10603
AN XY:
135492
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0362 AC: 52859AN: 1461884Hom.: 5583 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0362 AC XY: 26347AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
52859
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
26347
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0447 AC: 6811AN: 152294Hom.: 802 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0512 AC XY: 3812AN XY: 74472
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6811
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3812
AN XY:
74472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
53
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
52
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
34
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
119
ExAC
AF:
AC:
9287
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
643
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20799332, 23949966, 19115793, 20121942, 18278815, 19419265, 19036739, 15994871, 15317890, 30462859) - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Van der Woude syndrome;C0265259:Popliteal pterygium syndrome;C1837213:Orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Van der Woude syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;T;.
Polyphen
0.98
.;D;.
Vest4
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at