rs2272697
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_005908.4(MANBA):āc.2368T>Cā(p.Leu790Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.524 in 1,613,786 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 224,504 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.55 ( 23406 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.52 ( 201098 hom. )
Consequence
MANBA
NM_005908.4 synonymous
NM_005908.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.00
Genes affected
MANBA (HGNC:6831): (mannosidase beta) This gene encodes a member of the glycosyl hydrolase 2 family. The encoded protein localizes to the lysosome where it is the final exoglycosidase in the pathway for N-linked glycoprotein oligosaccharide catabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with beta-mannosidosis, a lysosomal storage disease that has a wide spectrum of neurological involvement. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 4-102634835-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-102634835-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95320.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-102634835-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.624 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANBA | NM_005908.4 | c.2368T>C | p.Leu790Leu | synonymous_variant | 16/17 | ENST00000647097.2 | NP_005899.3 | |
MANBA | XM_047415692.1 | c.2293T>C | p.Leu765Leu | synonymous_variant | 17/18 | XP_047271648.1 | ||
MANBA | XM_047415693.1 | c.2293T>C | p.Leu765Leu | synonymous_variant | 17/18 | XP_047271649.1 | ||
MANBA | XM_047415694.1 | c.1720T>C | p.Leu574Leu | synonymous_variant | 12/13 | XP_047271650.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANBA | ENST00000647097.2 | c.2368T>C | p.Leu790Leu | synonymous_variant | 16/17 | NM_005908.4 | ENSP00000495247.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.549 AC: 83484AN: 151954Hom.: 23368 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
83484
AN:
151954
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.541 AC: 135905AN: 251324Hom.: 37947 AF XY: 0.529 AC XY: 71883AN XY: 135828
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
135905
AN:
251324
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
71883
AN XY:
135828
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.521 AC: 762192AN: 1461714Hom.: 201098 Cov.: 60 AF XY: 0.518 AC XY: 376758AN XY: 727158
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
762192
AN:
1461714
Hom.:
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
AC XY:
376758
AN XY:
727158
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.550 AC: 83569AN: 152072Hom.: 23406 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.548 AC XY: 40779AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
83569
AN:
152072
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
40779
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1753
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 21, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 16, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 23, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Beta-D-mannosidosis Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at