rs2272903
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 1P and 10B. PP2BP4_ModerateBA1
The XM_017011233.2(TFAP2B):c.59G>A(p.Ser20Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.126 in 1,600,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15,106 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 4/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
XM_017011233.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Char syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- familial patent arterial ductInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFAP2B | ENST00000344788.7 | c.-67G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 4 | 3 | ENSP00000342252.3 | ||||
ENSG00000297125 | ENST00000745639.1 | n.343+44C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | ||||||
TFAP2B | ENST00000393655.4 | c.-34G>A | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | NM_003221.4 | ENSP00000377265.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.173 AC: 26273AN: 151822Hom.: 2792 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.149 AC: 37476AN: 250704 AF XY: 0.149 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.122 AC: 176025AN: 1448460Hom.: 12311 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.123 AC XY: 88848AN XY: 721588 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.173 AC: 26288AN: 151940Hom.: 2795 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.179 AC XY: 13294AN XY: 74268 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Char syndrome Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at