rs2273437
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):āc.46T>Cā(p.Leu16=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00379 in 1,596,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 134 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0055 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0036 ( 117 hom. )
Consequence
DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous
NM_001376.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.820
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
?
Variant 14-101964737-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-101964737-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128938.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-101964737-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.82 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00551 (837/151990) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0365 (188/5146). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0323. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 451 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd4 at 837 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNC1H1 | NM_001376.5 | c.46T>C | p.Leu16= | synonymous_variant | 1/78 | ENST00000360184.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNC1H1 | ENST00000360184.10 | c.46T>C | p.Leu16= | synonymous_variant | 1/78 | 1 | NM_001376.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00543 AC: 824AN: 151872Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
824
AN:
151872
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0122 AC: 2653AN: 216820Hom.: 61 AF XY: 0.0103 AC XY: 1241AN XY: 120048
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2653
AN:
216820
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1241
AN XY:
120048
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00361 AC: 5209AN: 1444868Hom.: 117 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00358 AC XY: 2569AN XY: 718432
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5209
AN:
1444868
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2569
AN XY:
718432
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00551 AC: 837AN: 151990Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00607 AC XY: 451AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
837
AN:
151990
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
451
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
85
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 14, 2023 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 21, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at