rs2273857
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):āc.1176A>Gā(p.Thr392Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0163 in 1,613,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 409 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.013 ( 39 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.017 ( 370 hom. )
Consequence
MYO6
NM_004999.4 synonymous
NM_004999.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.475
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 6-75855236-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-75855236-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45134.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-75855236-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.475 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0927 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | NM_004999.4 | c.1176A>G | p.Thr392Thr | synonymous_variant | 12/35 | ENST00000369977.8 | NP_004990.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | ENST00000369977.8 | c.1176A>G | p.Thr392Thr | synonymous_variant | 12/35 | 1 | NM_004999.4 | ENSP00000358994.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0129 AC: 1957AN: 152196Hom.: 39 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1957
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0164 AC: 4119AN: 250890Hom.: 119 AF XY: 0.0159 AC XY: 2162AN XY: 135602
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4119
AN:
250890
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2162
AN XY:
135602
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0167 AC: 24415AN: 1461356Hom.: 370 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0166 AC XY: 12087AN XY: 726990
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
24415
AN:
1461356
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
12087
AN XY:
726990
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0128 AC: 1955AN: 152314Hom.: 39 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0127 AC XY: 944AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1955
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
944
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
140
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 15, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 22, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 30, 2010 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at