rs2275602

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_025077.4(TOE1):​c.-45G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00207 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 55 hom. )

Consequence

TOE1
NM_025077.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
TOE1 (HGNC:15954): (target of EGR1, exonuclease) Enables poly(A)-specific ribonuclease activity and snRNA binding activity. Involved in RNA phosphodiester bond hydrolysis, exonucleolytic and snRNA 3'-end processing. Located in Cajal body and cytoplasm. Implicated in pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 7. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 1-45340208-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45340208-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138310.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-45340208-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00224 (342/152374) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0313 (162/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0273. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 218 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TOE1NM_025077.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-45G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/8 ENST00000372090.6 NP_079353.3
MUTYHNM_001128425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.36+11C>T intron_variant ENST00000710952.2 NP_001121897.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TOE1ENST00000372090.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.-45G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/81 NM_025077.4 ENSP00000361162 P1Q96GM8-1
MUTYHENST00000710952.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.36+11C>T intron_variant NM_001128425.2 ENSP00000518552

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00220
AC:
335
AN:
152256
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0312
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00677
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000823
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00337
AC:
840
AN:
249134
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00336
AC XY:
454
AN XY:
135284
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000869
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0249
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00866
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000900
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00296
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00206
AC:
3006
AN:
1461382
Hom.:
55
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00210
AC XY:
1527
AN XY:
727016
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000538
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0397
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00832
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00253
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00224
AC:
342
AN:
152374
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00293
AC XY:
218
AN XY:
74520
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0313
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00677
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000823
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00110
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00198
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0160
AC:
55
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 28, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 07, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaFeb 27, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 17, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 03, 2016- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MUTYH c.36+11C>T variant was identified in 7 of 276 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.04) from individuals or families with (Shinmura 2014,Tao 2004, Zhou 2005). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2275602) as "With other allele", in ClinVar (3x as Benign by GeneDx, Colour Genomics and Prevention Genetics), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (4x), and in UMD-LSDB (2x as unclassified variant). The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 7 individuals including 6 with a clinical indication for hereditary colon cancer testing. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, or MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 914 of 275438 chromosomes (11 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 23810 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), Other in 17 of 6424 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 3 of 34366 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 133 of 125622 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), East Asian in 467 of 18808 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Finnish in 213 of 25526 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), and South Asian in 79 of 30766 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing; however, the c.36+11C>T variant is located in the boundary region between MUTYH exon 1 and intron 1 and many reports have suggested that gene variants in the neighborhood of the junction are often accompanied by abnormal splicing (Tao 2008). In a Japanese population-based study, a statistically significant association was demonstrated between this variant and increased CRC risk (Tao 2008). Moreover, one haplotype containing the variant c.36+11T was demonstrated to be associated with increased CRC risk (OR of 1.43, haplotype .36+11C>T, c.504+35A>G, c.934−2A>G, and c.1014G>C, “TGAC”). The c.36+11C>T variant was found to be in complete linkage disequilibrium with two other MUTYH variants, –280G>A and c.1389G>C. These results indicate that individuals with the MUTYH – 280A/c.36+11T/c.1431C genotypes or the TGAC haplotype are susceptible to CRC (Tao 2008). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 28, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2275602; hg19: chr1-45805880; COSMIC: COSV59156766; COSMIC: COSV59156766; API