rs2276293

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):ā€‹c.5715A>Gā€‹(p.Lys1905=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.494 in 1,611,312 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 200,746 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.56 ( 24425 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.49 ( 176321 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.16
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 11-77206175-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77206175-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 43296.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77206175-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.16 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.698 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5715A>G p.Lys1905= synonymous_variant 41/49 ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.5715A>G p.Lys1905= synonymous_variant 41/491 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.558
AC:
84647
AN:
151796
Hom.:
24373
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.704
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.492
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.587
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.430
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.492
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.380
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.603
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.481
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.481
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.540
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.516
AC:
127132
AN:
246242
Hom.:
33918
AF XY:
0.502
AC XY:
67091
AN XY:
133568
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.706
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.641
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.429
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.509
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.391
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.594
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.482
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.484
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.488
AC:
711550
AN:
1459398
Hom.:
176321
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.483
AC XY:
350887
AN XY:
725886
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.706
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.634
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.420
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.483
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.396
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.594
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.479
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.482
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.558
AC:
84766
AN:
151914
Hom.:
24425
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.561
AC XY:
41613
AN XY:
74234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.704
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.588
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.430
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.492
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.380
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.603
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.481
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.540
Alfa
AF:
0.500
Hom.:
26544
Bravo
AF:
0.566
Asia WGS
AF:
0.452
AC:
1570
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 08, 2007- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
6.7
DANN
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2276293; hg19: chr11-76917220; COSMIC: COSV68683630; COSMIC: COSV68683630; API