rs2278196

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.100579G>A​(p.Val33527Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0253 in 1,613,412 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,143 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.038 ( 193 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.024 ( 950 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

5
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.77

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0015726686).
BP6
Variant 2-178536168-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178536168-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47629.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.137 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.100579G>A p.Val33527Ile missense_variant Exon 357 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.100579G>A p.Val33527Ile missense_variant Exon 357 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0379
AC:
5770
AN:
152050
Hom.:
194
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0701
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0283
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.146
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0531
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0317
AC:
7860
AN:
247972
AF XY:
0.0303
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0698
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0299
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0256
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.156
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0319
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0240
AC:
35112
AN:
1461244
Hom.:
950
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0234
AC XY:
17045
AN XY:
726868
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0703
AC:
2352
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0316
AC:
1412
AN:
44656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0253
AC:
662
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.164
AC:
6493
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
1175
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
167
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0803
AC:
463
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0185
AC:
20576
AN:
1111594
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0300
AC:
1812
AN:
60344
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1995
3990
5985
7980
9975
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
902
1804
2706
3608
4510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0380
AC:
5778
AN:
152168
Hom.:
193
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0372
AC XY:
2771
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0702
AC:
2914
AN:
41514
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0378
AC:
577
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0283
AC:
98
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.145
AC:
751
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0127
AC:
61
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
20
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0544
AC:
16
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
1227
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0520
AC:
110
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
278
555
833
1110
1388
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
68
136
204
272
340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0278
Hom.:
414
Bravo
AF:
0.0424
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0178
AC:
66
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0179
AC:
69
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0651
AC:
247
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0174
AC:
143
ExAC
AF:
0.0309
AC:
3731
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0600
AC:
209
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0230
EpiControl
AF:
0.0251

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 11, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.87
Eigen
Uncertain
0.21
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.37
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.21
.;.;.;N;.;.;N
PhyloP100
4.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.50
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
0.24
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.77
.;.;.;P;.;.;P
Vest4
0.19
MPC
0.084
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
5.8
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2278196; hg19: chr2-179400895; COSMIC: COSV60452995; COSMIC: COSV60452995; API