rs2286128

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):​c.1710G>A​(p.Ser570Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0096 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 622 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.035 ( 237 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0070 ( 385 hom. )

Consequence

CNTNAP2
NM_014141.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.42

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CNTNAP2 (HGNC:13830): (contactin associated protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the neurexin family which functions in the vertebrate nervous system as cell adhesion molecules and receptors. This protein, like other neurexin proteins, contains epidermal growth factor repeats and laminin G domains. In addition, it includes an F5/8 type C domain, discoidin/neuropilin- and fibrinogen-like domains, thrombospondin N-terminal-like domains and a putative PDZ binding site. This protein is localized at the juxtaparanodes of myelinated axons, and mediates interactions between neurons and glia during nervous system development and is also involved in localization of potassium channels within differentiating axons. This gene encompasses almost 1.5% of chromosome 7 and is one of the largest genes in the human genome. It is directly bound and regulated by forkhead box protein P2, a transcription factor related to speech and language development. This gene has been implicated in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, ADHD and intellectual disability. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]
CNTNAP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 7-147485974-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-147485974-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95557.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.41 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0972 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CNTNAP2NM_014141.6 linkc.1710G>A p.Ser570Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 24 ENST00000361727.8 NP_054860.1 Q9UHC6-1A0A090N7T7B2RCH4
CNTNAP2XM_017011950.3 linkc.1710G>A p.Ser570Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 14 XP_016867439.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CNTNAP2ENST00000361727.8 linkc.1710G>A p.Ser570Ser synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 24 1 NM_014141.6 ENSP00000354778.3 Q9UHC6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0345
AC:
5237
AN:
152012
Hom.:
236
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0997
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0503
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000647
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0316
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0196
AC:
4921
AN:
251470
AF XY:
0.0145
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0737
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000422
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0142
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00700
AC:
10236
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
385
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00619
AC XY:
4505
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0963
AC:
3225
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0730
AC:
3263
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00172
AC:
45
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0571
AC:
2268
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00339
AC:
292
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00503
AC:
29
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000374
AC:
416
AN:
1111974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
697
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.453
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
532
1064
1595
2127
2659
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
180
360
540
720
900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0345
AC:
5252
AN:
152130
Hom.:
237
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0341
AC XY:
2535
AN XY:
74388
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0997
AC:
4138
AN:
41486
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0502
AC:
768
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00259
AC:
9
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0386
AC:
199
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00498
AC:
24
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000943
AC:
1
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000647
AC:
44
AN:
67990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0318
AC:
67
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
244
488
732
976
1220
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0170
Hom.:
83
Bravo
AF:
0.0421
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0280
AC:
97
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Dec 18, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 10, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 17, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 16, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
2.8
DANN
Benign
0.58
PhyloP100
-1.4
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2286128; hg19: chr7-147183066; COSMIC: COSV100663207; API