rs2286342
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_153717.3(EVC):c.939+10A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.666 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 362,604 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 33943 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.67 ( 328661 hom. )
Consequence
EVC
NM_153717.3 intron
NM_153717.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.191
Genes affected
EVC (HGNC:3497): (EvC ciliary complex subunit 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a leucine zipper and a transmembrane domain. This gene has been implicated in both Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (EvC) and Weyers acrodental dysostosis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.98).
BP6
Variant 4-5745351-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-5745351-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 262784.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-5745351-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.706 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | NM_153717.3 | c.939+10A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000264956.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | ENST00000264956.11 | c.939+10A>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_153717.3 | P1 | |||
EVC | ENST00000509451.1 | c.939+10A>G | intron_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.663 AC: 100741AN: 151844Hom.: 33920 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
100741
AN:
151844
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.621 AC: 156079AN: 251244Hom.: 49870 AF XY: 0.624 AC XY: 84739AN XY: 135796
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
156079
AN:
251244
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
84739
AN XY:
135796
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.667 AC: 973956AN: 1461206Hom.: 328661 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.664 AC XY: 482989AN XY: 726946
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
973956
AN:
1461206
Hom.:
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
AC XY:
482989
AN XY:
726946
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.664 AC: 100830AN: 151962Hom.: 33943 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.657 AC XY: 48843AN XY: 74292
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
100830
AN:
151962
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
48843
AN XY:
74292
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1708
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | Jun 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 02, 2018 | - - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome;C0457013:Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at