rs2286965
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The ENST00000001146.7(CYP26B1):c.1138G>A(p.Glu380Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000929 in 1,613,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000001146.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP26B1 | NM_019885.4 | c.1138G>A | p.Glu380Lys | missense_variant | 5/6 | ENST00000001146.7 | NP_063938.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP26B1 | ENST00000001146.7 | c.1138G>A | p.Glu380Lys | missense_variant | 5/6 | 1 | NM_019885.4 | ENSP00000001146 | P1 | |
CYP26B1 | ENST00000546307.5 | c.913G>A | p.Glu305Lys | missense_variant | 4/5 | 1 | ENSP00000443304 | |||
CYP26B1 | ENST00000412253.1 | c.565G>A | p.Glu189Lys | missense_variant | 4/5 | 1 | ENSP00000401465 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000841 AC: 128AN: 152234Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00202 AC: 499AN: 247586Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00172 AC XY: 232AN XY: 134520
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000938 AC: 1371AN: 1460852Hom.: 29 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000893 AC XY: 649AN XY: 726748
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000840 AC: 128AN: 152352Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000819 AC XY: 61AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at