rs2288024

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001243156.2(TAF1C):​c.*1082A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.038 in 1,586,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,318 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 87 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.039 ( 1231 hom. )

Consequence

TAF1C
NM_001243156.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.92
Variant links:
Genes affected
TAF1C (HGNC:11534): (TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I subunit C) Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase I requires the formation of a complex composed of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and three TBP-associated factors (TAFs) specific for RNA polymerase I. This complex, known as SL1, binds to the core promoter of ribosomal RNA genes to position the polymerase properly and acts as a channel for regulatory signals. This gene encodes the largest SL1-specific TAF. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]
DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 16-84177859-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84177859-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 262932.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-84177859-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0307 (4677/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0439 (2986/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0426. There are 87 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2313 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 87 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TAF1CNM_001243156.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1082A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/15 ENST00000566732.6
DNAAF1NM_178452.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.*18T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 12/12 ENST00000378553.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAAF1ENST00000378553.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.*18T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 12/121 NM_178452.6 P1Q8NEP3-1
TAF1CENST00000566732.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1082A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/152 NM_001243156.2 P2Q15572-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0308
AC:
4681
AN:
152206
Hom.:
87
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00832
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00877
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0396
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0439
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0273
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0341
AC:
8558
AN:
251152
Hom.:
192
AF XY:
0.0330
AC XY:
4475
AN XY:
135794
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00592
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0459
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0358
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0322
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0388
AC:
55692
AN:
1434578
Hom.:
1231
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
0.0380
AC XY:
27198
AN XY:
715154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0216
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0454
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0319
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0426
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0336
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0307
AC:
4677
AN:
152324
Hom.:
87
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0311
AC XY:
2313
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00830
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0431
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0439
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0270
Alfa
AF:
0.0371
Hom.:
119
Bravo
AF:
0.0310
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0380
AC:
132
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 24, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31213628) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2288024; hg19: chr16-84211465; COSMIC: COSV58985333; COSMIC: COSV58985333; API