rs2288200
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.20192A>T(p.Asp6731Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0169 in 1,613,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,437 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D6731Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nemaline myopathy 2Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Ambry Genetics
- childhood-onset nemaline myopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- intermediate nemaline myopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- typical nemaline myopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- lethal multiple pterygium syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- severe congenital nemaline myopathyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.20192A>T | p.Asp6731Val | missense_variant | Exon 132 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.20192A>T | p.Asp6731Val | missense_variant | Exon 132 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0444 AC: 6751AN: 152096Hom.: 392 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0305 AC: 7567AN: 247902 AF XY: 0.0309 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0140 AC: 20443AN: 1461296Hom.: 1033 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0154 AC XY: 11176AN XY: 726914 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0446 AC: 6786AN: 152214Hom.: 404 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0450 AC XY: 3352AN XY: 74418 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
p.Asp6731Val in exon 132 of NEB: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 11.8% (446/3794) of African Americ an chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.e du/EVS/; dbSNP rs2288200).
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.
not provided Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at