rs2288550

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000883.4(IMPDH1):​c.987G>C​(p.Leu329Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.168 in 1,613,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23,740 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L329L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1650 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.17 ( 22090 hom. )

Consequence

IMPDH1
NM_000883.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.20

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
IMPDH1 (HGNC:6052): (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1) The protein encoded by this gene acts as a homotetramer to regulate cell growth. The encoded protein is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of xanthine monophosphate (XMP) from inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP). This is the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. Defects in this gene are a cause of retinitis pigmentosa type 10 (RP10). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
IMPDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • inherited retinal dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa 10
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 7-128398501-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-128398501-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 358876.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.2 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.206 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
IMPDH1NM_000883.4 linkc.987G>C p.Leu329Leu synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENST00000338791.11 NP_000874.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
IMPDH1ENST00000338791.11 linkc.987G>C p.Leu329Leu synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 17 2 NM_000883.4 ENSP00000345096.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.142
AC:
21605
AN:
152056
Hom.:
1647
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0773
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0857
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.124
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.127
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.216
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.196
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.155
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.177
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.152
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.157
AC:
39491
AN:
250902
AF XY:
0.165
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0753
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0882
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.191
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.173
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.146
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.170
AC:
248985
AN:
1461288
Hom.:
22090
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.173
AC XY:
125537
AN XY:
726956
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0765
AC:
2561
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0895
AC:
4001
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.124
AC:
3243
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.128
AC:
5101
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.226
AC:
19509
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.187
AC:
9960
AN:
53276
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.134
AC:
767
AN:
5742
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.175
AC:
194093
AN:
1111656
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.162
AC:
9750
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10413
20826
31240
41653
52066
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
6862
13724
20586
27448
34310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.142
AC:
21618
AN:
152174
Hom.:
1650
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.144
AC XY:
10715
AN XY:
74382
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0772
AC:
3206
AN:
41526
American (AMR)
AF:
0.113
AC:
1725
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.124
AC:
429
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.127
AC:
659
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.217
AC:
1048
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.196
AC:
2079
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.160
AC:
47
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.177
AC:
12018
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.156
AC:
329
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
954
1909
2863
3818
4772
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
260
520
780
1040
1300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.163
Hom.:
619
Bravo
AF:
0.129
Asia WGS
AF:
0.178
AC:
617
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.167
EpiControl
AF:
0.164

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 11 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2288550; hg19: chr7-128038555; COSMIC: COSV58315354; COSMIC: COSV58315354; API