rs2290177

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_201525.4(ADGRG1):​c.1665-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.215 in 1,611,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40,395 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.21 ( 3874 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.22 ( 36521 hom. )

Consequence

ADGRG1
NM_201525.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001573
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADGRG1 (HGNC:4512): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G1) This gene encodes a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and regulates brain cortical patterning. The encoded protein binds specifically to transglutaminase 2, a component of tissue and tumor stroma implicated as an inhibitor of tumor progression. Mutations in this gene are associated with a brain malformation known as bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 16-57661692-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-57661692-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 158624.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-57661692-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.47 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ADGRG1NM_201525.4 linkc.1665-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 13 ENST00000562631.7 NP_958933.1 Q9Y653-2A0A0S2Z517

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ADGRG1ENST00000562631.7 linkc.1665-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 13 1 NM_201525.4 ENSP00000455351.2 Q9Y653-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.214
AC:
32591
AN:
152074
Hom.:
3868
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.162
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.267
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.321
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.203
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.486
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.222
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.211
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.174
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.201
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.231
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.256
AC:
61999
AN:
242228
Hom.:
9181
AF XY:
0.248
AC XY:
32519
AN XY:
131224
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.159
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.420
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.213
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.496
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.221
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.210
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.202
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.237
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.215
AC:
313739
AN:
1459084
Hom.:
36521
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.215
AC XY:
155818
AN XY:
725834
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.167
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.206
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.474
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.218
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.209
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.219
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.214
AC:
32618
AN:
152192
Hom.:
3874
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.220
AC XY:
16365
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.162
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.321
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.203
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.486
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.222
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.211
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.201
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.229
Alfa
AF:
0.210
Hom.:
4318
Bravo
AF:
0.225
Asia WGS
AF:
0.323
AC:
1122
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria Benign:3
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
0.65
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000016
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.012
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2290177; hg19: chr16-57695604; COSMIC: COSV65635348; COSMIC: COSV65635348; API