Menu
GeneBe

rs2292487

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017739.4(POMGNT1):ā€‹c.681A>Gā€‹(p.Lys227=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.354 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 103,172 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K227?) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.35 ( 9438 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.35 ( 93734 hom. )

Consequence

POMGNT1
NM_017739.4 synonymous

Scores

1
14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.397
Variant links:
Genes affected
POMGNT1 (HGNC:19139): (protein O-linked mannose N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 1 (beta 1,2-)) This gene encodes a type II transmembrane protein that resides in the Golgi apparatus. It participates in O-mannosyl glycosylation and is specific for alpha linked terminal mannose. Mutations in this gene may be associated with muscle-eye-brain disease and several congenital muscular dystrophies. Alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029520392).
BP6
Variant 1-46194623-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-46194623-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95761.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-46194623-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.397 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.419 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
POMGNT1NM_017739.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.681A>G p.Lys227= synonymous_variant 8/22 ENST00000371984.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
POMGNT1ENST00000371984.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.681A>G p.Lys227= synonymous_variant 8/221 NM_017739.4 P1Q8WZA1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.349
AC:
53060
AN:
151964
Hom.:
9428
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.350
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.189
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.362
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.313
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.434
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.384
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.335
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.350
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.355
AC:
89316
AN:
251468
Hom.:
16649
AF XY:
0.358
AC XY:
48697
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.347
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.389
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.306
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.446
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.392
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.352
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.354
AC:
518207
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
93734
Cov.:
95
AF XY:
0.358
AC XY:
260087
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.361
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.388
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.308
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.450
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.395
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.342
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.349
AC:
53131
AN:
152082
Hom.:
9438
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.351
AC XY:
26109
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.350
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.362
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.313
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.160
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.435
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.384
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.353
Alfa
AF:
0.356
Hom.:
8045
Bravo
AF:
0.343
TwinsUK
AF:
0.340
AC:
1260
ALSPAC
AF:
0.348
AC:
1342
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.351
AC:
1548
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.349
AC:
3000
ExAC
AF:
0.355
AC:
43071
Asia WGS
AF:
0.288
AC:
1002
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.337
EpiControl
AF:
0.333

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 18, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 26, 2014p.Lys227Lys in exon 8 of POMGNT1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 35% (3000/8600) of European Ameri can chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington. edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs2292487). -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2O Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 14, 2017- -
Retinitis pigmentosa 76 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with intellectual disability), type B3;C3150417:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2O Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with intellectual disability), type B3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -
Muscle eye brain disease Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Congenital Muscular Dystrophy, alpha-dystroglycan related Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.68
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
8.2
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0022
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.047
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.020
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.24
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.27
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.14
N
REVEL
Benign
0.048
Sift
Uncertain
0.018
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T
Vest4
0.031
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
3.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2292487; hg19: chr1-46660295; COSMIC: COSV64339346; COSMIC: COSV64339346; API