rs2298806
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024649.5(BBS1):c.378G>A(p.Leu126Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.233 in 1,613,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45,934 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.21 ( 3877 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 42057 hom. )
Consequence
BBS1
NM_024649.5 synonymous
NM_024649.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.14
Genes affected
BBS1 (HGNC:966): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1) Mutations in this gene have been observed in patients with the major form (type 1) of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. The encoded protein may play a role in eye, limb, cardiac and reproductive system development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 11-66514624-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-66514624-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261750.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-66514624-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.256 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS1 | NM_024649.5 | c.378G>A | p.Leu126Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/17 | ENST00000318312.12 | NP_078925.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS1 | ENST00000318312.12 | c.378G>A | p.Leu126Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/17 | 1 | NM_024649.5 | ENSP00000317469.7 | ||
ENSG00000256349 | ENST00000419755.3 | c.489G>A | p.Leu163Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/17 | 2 | ENSP00000398526.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.212 AC: 32259AN: 151952Hom.: 3870 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
32259
AN:
151952
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.224 AC: 56195AN: 250730Hom.: 6918 AF XY: 0.227 AC XY: 30842AN XY: 135580
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
56195
AN:
250730
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30842
AN XY:
135580
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.235 AC: 344006AN: 1461140Hom.: 42057 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.236 AC XY: 171356AN XY: 726920
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
344006
AN:
1461140
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
171356
AN XY:
726920
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.212 AC: 32278AN: 152070Hom.: 3877 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.217 AC XY: 16144AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
32278
AN:
152070
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
16144
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
831
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 15, 2016 | Variant summary: The BBS1 c.378G>A (p.Leu126Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant along with 5/5 splice prediction tools predicting the variant not to have an impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 27024/121032 control chromosomes (3285 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2232798, which greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BBS1 variant (0.0009449), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. A clinical diagnostic laboratory and at least one publication classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at