Menu
GeneBe

rs2301703

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1

The NM_000352.6(ABCC8):c.579+14C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.395 in 1,592,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 129,616 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.47 ( 18440 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.39 ( 111176 hom. )

Consequence

ABCC8
NM_000352.6 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.634
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCC8 (HGNC:59): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein functions as a modulator of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and insulin release. Mutations in the ABCC8 gene and deficiencies in the encoded protein have been observed in patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder of unregulated and high insulin secretion. Mutations have also been associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, an autosomal dominant disease of defective insulin secretion. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 11-17463424-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17463424-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 157707.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=11, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-17463424-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.694 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ABCC8NM_000352.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.579+14C>T intron_variant ENST00000389817.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ABCC8ENST00000389817.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.579+14C>T intron_variant 1 NM_000352.6 P4Q09428-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.470
AC:
71455
AN:
151990
Hom.:
18395
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.701
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.391
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.429
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.477
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.401
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.295
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.291
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.538
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.385
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.475
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.389
AC:
85736
AN:
220200
Hom.:
17554
AF XY:
0.379
AC XY:
44778
AN XY:
118134
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.708
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.475
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.382
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.287
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.291
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.381
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.400
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.387
AC:
557883
AN:
1440108
Hom.:
111176
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.384
AC XY:
274462
AN XY:
714258
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.715
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.409
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.470
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.389
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.291
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.299
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.384
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.414
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.470
AC:
71544
AN:
152108
Hom.:
18440
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.464
AC XY:
34481
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.701
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.429
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.477
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.400
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.296
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.291
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.385
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.471
Alfa
AF:
0.377
Hom.:
1984
Bravo
AF:
0.493
Asia WGS
AF:
0.356
AC:
1240
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 09, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 12, 2017- -
Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJul 01, 2021- -
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Mutations in ABCC8 gene are generally associated with both neonatal diabetes mellitus as well as MODY. Patients with this mutation may respond to sulfonylureas. Although, rs2301703 prevalence in Neonatal Diabetes mellitus is seen, its association with T2DM is yet to be ascertained. -
Leucine-induced hypoglycemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJul 01, 2021- -
Diabetes mellitus, permanent neonatal 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJul 01, 2021- -
Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
Cadd
Benign
7.3
Dann
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2301703; hg19: chr11-17484971; COSMIC: COSV56856529; COSMIC: COSV56856529; API