rs2301865
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_024306.5(FA2H):c.879C>T(p.Pro293Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.797 in 1,612,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 514,126 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024306.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary spastic paraplegia 35Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA2H | NM_024306.5 | c.879C>T | p.Pro293Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | ENST00000219368.8 | NP_077282.3 | |
| FA2H | XM_011523319.3 | c.639C>T | p.Pro213Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | XP_011521621.1 | ||
| FA2H | XM_011523317.4 | c.*1743C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | XP_011521619.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA2H | ENST00000219368.8 | c.879C>T | p.Pro293Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | 1 | NM_024306.5 | ENSP00000219368.3 | ||
| FA2H | ENST00000562145.1 | n.600C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 2 | 1 | |||||
| FA2H | ENST00000567683.5 | n.*158C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | 2 | ENSP00000455126.1 | ||||
| FA2H | ENST00000567683.5 | n.*158C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | 2 | ENSP00000455126.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.774 AC: 117281AN: 151562Hom.: 45581 Cov.: 29 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.772 AC: 192521AN: 249406 AF XY: 0.772 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.799 AC: 1167962AN: 1461230Hom.: 468526 Cov.: 64 AF XY: 0.797 AC XY: 579596AN XY: 726908 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.774 AC: 117345AN: 151680Hom.: 45600 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.772 AC XY: 57233AN XY: 74098 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary spastic paraplegia 35 Benign:5
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 95% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy, Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy and Abnormal Movements and Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Number of patients: 88. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Spastic paraplegia Benign:1
- -
Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at