rs2307130
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PVS1_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000370165.7(AGL):c.-8-2A>G variant causes a splice acceptor change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.484 in 1,610,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 191,964 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000370165.7 splice_acceptor
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | NM_000642.3 | c.-10A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/34 | ENST00000361915.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | ENST00000361915.8 | c.-10A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/34 | 1 | NM_000642.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.419 AC: 63647AN: 151976Hom.: 14073 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.469 AC: 117972AN: 251340Hom.: 28421 AF XY: 0.479 AC XY: 65025AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.491 AC: 715475AN: 1458534Hom.: 177867 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.493 AC XY: 357476AN XY: 725786
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.419 AC: 63701AN: 152094Hom.: 14097 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.420 AC XY: 31205AN XY: 74338
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease type III Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Phosphorus, Inc. | Aug 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 24, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at