rs2307130

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000642.3(AGL):​c.-10A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.484 in 1,610,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 191,964 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.42 ( 14097 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.49 ( 177867 hom. )

Consequence

AGL
NM_000642.3 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001780
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.357

Publications

34 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AGL (HGNC:321): (amylo-alpha-1, 6-glucosidase, 4-alpha-glucanotransferase) This gene encodes the glycogen debrancher enzyme which is involved in glycogen degradation. This enzyme has two independent catalytic activities which occur at different sites on the protein: a 4-alpha-glucotransferase activity and a amylo-1,6-glucosidase activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with glycogen storage disease although a wide range of enzymatic and clinical variability occurs which may be due to tissue-specific alternative splicing. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
AGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • glycogen storage disease III
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 1-99851033-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-99851033-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 195096.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.528 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AGLNM_000642.3 linkc.-10A>G 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 2 of 34 ENST00000361915.8 NP_000633.2 P35573-1A0A0S2A4E4
AGLNM_000642.3 linkc.-10A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 34 ENST00000361915.8 NP_000633.2 P35573-1A0A0S2A4E4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AGLENST00000361915.8 linkc.-10A>G 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 2 of 34 1 NM_000642.3 ENSP00000355106.3 P35573-1
AGLENST00000361915.8 linkc.-10A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 34 1 NM_000642.3 ENSP00000355106.3 P35573-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.419
AC:
63647
AN:
151976
Hom.:
14073
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.263
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.447
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.434
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.395
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.545
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.543
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.434
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.348
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.490
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.422
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.469
AC:
117972
AN:
251340
AF XY:
0.479
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.263
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.439
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.390
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.534
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.437
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.492
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.469
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.491
AC:
715475
AN:
1458534
Hom.:
177867
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.493
AC XY:
357476
AN XY:
725786
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.258
AC:
8622
AN:
33382
American (AMR)
AF:
0.435
AC:
19460
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.398
AC:
10404
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.545
AC:
21611
AN:
39632
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.538
AC:
46346
AN:
86202
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.443
AC:
23680
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.371
AC:
2130
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.500
AC:
554774
AN:
1109108
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.472
AC:
28448
AN:
60244
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17231
34462
51694
68925
86156
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16122
32244
48366
64488
80610
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.419
AC:
63701
AN:
152094
Hom.:
14097
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.420
AC XY:
31205
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.263
AC:
10915
AN:
41496
American (AMR)
AF:
0.435
AC:
6646
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.395
AC:
1370
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.545
AC:
2814
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.545
AC:
2628
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.434
AC:
4579
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.350
AC:
103
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.490
AC:
33328
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.431
AC:
910
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1838
3676
5515
7353
9191
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
610
1220
1830
2440
3050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.459
Hom.:
50876
Bravo
AF:
0.413
Asia WGS
AF:
0.530
AC:
1845
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease type III Benign:4
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2017
Phosphorus, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 24, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Oct 22, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
0.36
Mutation Taster
=46/54
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00018
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2307130; hg19: chr1-100316589; COSMIC: COSV54056176; COSMIC: COSV54056176; API