rs2495482
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001407246.1(PCSK9):c.-513A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.944 in 1,553,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 692,792 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.92 ( 64013 hom., cov: 38)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.95 ( 628779 hom. )
Consequence
PCSK9
NM_001407246.1 5_prime_UTR
NM_001407246.1 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.224
Genes affected
PCSK9 (HGNC:20001): (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) This gene encodes a member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family, which includes proteases that process protein and peptide precursors trafficking through regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The encoded protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing event with its prosegment in the ER and is constitutively secreted as an inactive protease into the extracellular matrix and trans-Golgi network. It is expressed in liver, intestine and kidney tissues and escorts specific receptors for lysosomal degradation. It plays a role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 1-55040059-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55040059-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 262904.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-55040059-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.95 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSK9 | NM_174936.4 | c.207+15A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000302118.5 | NP_777596.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSK9 | ENST00000302118.5 | c.207+15A>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_174936.4 | ENSP00000303208.5 | ||||
PCSK9 | ENST00000710286.1 | c.564+15A>G | intron_variant | ENSP00000518176.1 | ||||||
PCSK9 | ENST00000673726.1 | n.207+15A>G | intron_variant | ENSP00000501004.1 | ||||||
PCSK9 | ENST00000673913.2 | n.207+15A>G | intron_variant | ENSP00000501161.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.915 AC: 139342AN: 152240Hom.: 63976 Cov.: 38
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
139342
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.928 AC: 147203AN: 158652Hom.: 68556 AF XY: 0.936 AC XY: 79055AN XY: 84504
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
147203
AN:
158652
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
79055
AN XY:
84504
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.947 AC: 1326590AN: 1400768Hom.: 628779 Cov.: 65 AF XY: 0.949 AC XY: 655717AN XY: 691306
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1326590
AN:
1400768
Hom.:
Cov.:
65
AF XY:
AC XY:
655717
AN XY:
691306
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.915 AC: 139434AN: 152358Hom.: 64013 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.917 AC XY: 68323AN XY: 74510
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
139434
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
68323
AN XY:
74510
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3315
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 28, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 07, 2018 | - - |
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 22, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Iberoamerican FH Network | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GENinCode PLC | Jul 01, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cohesion Phenomics | Feb 09, 2023 | - - |
Hypobetalipoproteinemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at