rs267606931
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_181458.4(PAX3):c.167G>T(p.Arg56Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R56H) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_181458.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAX3 | NM_181458.4 | c.167G>T | p.Arg56Leu | missense_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000392070.7 | NP_852123.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAX3 | ENST00000392070.7 | c.167G>T | p.Arg56Leu | missense_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_181458.4 | ENSP00000375922 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Waardenburg syndrome type 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Mar 01, 1993 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2021 | - - |
Waardenburg syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Cochlear Implant Center | Apr 12, 2021 | PS1_Moderate, PM2_Moderate, PM5_Moderate, PP3_Supporting - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at