rs267607001

Variant summary

Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points: 15P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3PP5_Very_Strong

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):​c.1901G>A​(p.Arg634Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000287 in 1,395,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R634W) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense

Scores

7
7
2

Clinical Significance

Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points.

PM1
In a region_of_interest RS (size 27) in uniprot entity RBM20_HUMAN there are 8 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (89%) in NM_001134363.3
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr10-110812297-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.831
PP5
Variant 10-110812298-G-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr10-110812298-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-110812298-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RBM20NM_001134363.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1901G>A p.Arg634Gln missense_variant 9/14 ENST00000369519.4 NP_001127835.2
RBM20XM_017016103.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1736G>A p.Arg579Gln missense_variant 9/14 XP_016871592.1
RBM20XM_017016104.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1517G>A p.Arg506Gln missense_variant 9/14 XP_016871593.1
RBM20XM_047425116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1517G>A p.Arg506Gln missense_variant 9/14 XP_047281072.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RBM20ENST00000369519.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1901G>A p.Arg634Gln missense_variant 9/141 NM_001134363.3 ENSP00000358532 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000656
AC:
1
AN:
152378
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
81174
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000408
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000287
AC:
4
AN:
1395174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00000436
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
687380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000281
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000186
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000799
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Pathogenic:7
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedprovider interpretationStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityApr 06, 2017p.Arg634Gln (c.1901G>A) (R634Q) in exon 9 of the RBM20 gene (NM_001134363.1) Given the case data, strong segregation data, supporting in-vitro data, location of the variant in the “hotspot” region of exon 9, and low prevalence in controls, we consider this variant very likely disease causing and we do feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). I checked with LMM, and they have not seen the variant but would classify it as either likely pathogenic or pathogenic (Colleen, 2015). RBM20: Variants in RBM20 are relatively newly-reported with cardiomyopathy and appear to be an infrequent cause of cardiomyopathy (1.9-3.0%) so only minimal data on disease-associated variation in this gene is available. Brauch et al (2009) performed genome-wide linkage analysis in two multi-generational kindreds with DCM, with a LOD score of 3.55. Interestingly, at the time of this study the function of RBM20 was not known, though it was known to be expressed at much higher levels in the heart than in other tissues. Sequencing of the candidate region identified two RBM20 variants, one in each family, that segregated with disease and were absent in 480 controls. They then performed DHLPC analysis of RBM20 in a cohort of 279 DCM patients and identified 6 additional families with RBM20 variants. Hershberger's group used a candidate gene approach, sequencing select RBM20 exons in 312 DCM probands and found rare variants in 6 unrelated patients. RBM20 has been implicated in abnormal TTN splicing and RBM20 deficient mice show signs of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias (Guo et al 2013). Based on the domains identified in RBM20 it is thought to be an RNA binding protein. Of note, an area in exon 9 appears to be especially susceptible to pathogenic variation. Both variants from the original linkage study were in exon 9. Per an LMM review of the data: "Further study in a larger cohort identified additional variants that all clustered in exon 9, specifically the RS domain. All of these variants segregated with disease and were not identified in controls. This association was further examined by Li and colleagues in 2010, identifying both novel and previously reported variants (Brauch 2009) in the same region of exon 9 in a different cohort of individuals with DCM. More recent studies provide further support for this association (Guo 2012, Refaat 2012). While further study is needed, variants in this particular region of RBM20 appear to be associated with an earlier age of onset, high penetrance, end-stage heart failure and a high mortality." Furthermore, LMM's own internal experience is consistent with the published data: "after 3 years of testing, our laboratory has identified 3 clinically significant variants (classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic) in this hotspot region of exon 9 in 6 families with DCM; 2 of these families had been previously tested by our laboratory and were negative for any disease-causing variants. All 3 of these variants had been previously reported (Brauch 2009, Li 2010), further supporting that the RS region of exon 9 is likely a hotspot of variation. In addition, the phenotype in these families is consistent with those described previously, which emphasizes the importance and significance of identifying families with disease-causing variation in RBM20 so that the proper management and screening can be implemented." Hershberger's group suggests this is a 5 amino acid hot spot. This region is rich in arginines and serines and is predicted to be involved in protein-protein interactions. Brauch et al (2009) noted a particularly malignant course in families with RBM20 variants, compared to other familial DCM cases. Age of diagnosis of DCM was 9 years younger and many affected individuals died suddenly, needed transplant, or an ICD. Some individuals had left ventricular hypertrophy. While many pedigrees had quite severe disease there was still variability among family members, as -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAiLife Diagnostics, AiLife DiagnosticsJan 19, 2022- -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 18, 2022An in vitro splice reporter assay supports an adverse effect when compared to wild-type (Guo et al., 2012); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26604136, 26187847, 22004663, 20590677, 30050558, 30547036, 30871348, 33019804, 19712804, 22466703) -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Pathogenic:5
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsOct 23, 2022- -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 25, 2023This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 634 of the RBM20 protein (p.Arg634Gln). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy (PMID: 19712804, 20590677, 33019804). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 269). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on RBM20 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RBM20 function (PMID: 22466703). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMJun 01, 2010- -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEquipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de BourgogneSep 22, 2020- -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaAug 14, 2019This variant was classified as: Pathogenic. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PS1,PM1,PM2,PP3,PP4. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 27, 2023The p.R634Q variant (also known as c.1901G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the RBM20 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1901. The arginine at codon 634 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy and segregated with disease in multiple affected relatives in at least one family (Brauch KM et al. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 Sep;54(10):930-42; Li D et al. Clin. Trans. Sci. 2010 Jun;3(3):90-7; Hey TM et al. Circ Heart Fail, 2019 03;12:e005700). In addition, other alterations affecting the same amino acid (p.R634W and p.R634L) have been reported in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (Li D et al. Clin. Trans. Sci. 2010 Jun;3:90-7; Sedaghat-Hamedani F et al. Eur. Heart J., 2017 Dec;38:3449-3460). This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.54
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.32
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.22
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.59
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.50
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.18
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.83
D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.90
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0080
D
Vest4
0.63
MutPred
0.70
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0252);
MVP
0.88
ClinPred
0.86
D
GERP RS
5.7
gMVP
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs267607001; hg19: chr10-112572056; COSMIC: COSV65704238; API