rs267607560
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.274C>G(p.Leu92Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L92F) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_170707.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | NM_170707.4 | c.274C>G | p.Leu92Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 12 | ENST00000368300.9 | NP_733821.1 | |
LMNA | NM_005572.4 | c.274C>G | p.Leu92Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | ENST00000677389.1 | NP_005563.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | ENST00000368300.9 | c.274C>G | p.Leu92Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 12 | 1 | NM_170707.4 | ENSP00000357283.4 | ||
LMNA | ENST00000677389.1 | c.274C>G | p.Leu92Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | NM_005572.4 | ENSP00000503633.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460742Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726666
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Pathogenic:1
ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 849968). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt LMNA protein function. This variant disrupts the p.Leu92 amino acid residue in LMNA. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 17711925, 21846512; Invitae). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LMNA-related conditions. This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 92 of the LMNA protein (p.Leu92Val). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.L92V variant (also known as c.274C>G), located in coding exon 1 of the LMNA gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 274. The leucine at codon 92 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. Another alteration at the same codon, p.L92F (c.274C>T), has been detected in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, conduction system disease, and/or lipodystrophy (Caron M et al. Cell Death Differ, 2007 Oct;14:1759-67; Chami N et al. Can J Cardiol, 2014 Dec;30:1655-61; Marschall C et al. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2019 Oct;9:S292-S298; Millat G et al. Eur J Med Genet Aug;54:e570-5). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at