rs267607564
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP2
The NM_170707.4(LMNA):āc.1262T>Cā(p.Leu421Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,612,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L421L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_170707.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | NM_170707.4 | c.1262T>C | p.Leu421Pro | missense_variant | 7/12 | ENST00000368300.9 | |
LMNA | NM_005572.4 | c.1262T>C | p.Leu421Pro | missense_variant | 7/10 | ENST00000677389.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | ENST00000368300.9 | c.1262T>C | p.Leu421Pro | missense_variant | 7/12 | 1 | NM_170707.4 | P1 | |
LMNA | ENST00000677389.1 | c.1262T>C | p.Leu421Pro | missense_variant | 7/10 | NM_005572.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250794Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135646
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1459986Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000551 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726308
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74294
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Epithelial Biology; Institute of Medical Biology, Singapore | - | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 23, 2023 | Identified in a patient with obesity, diabetes, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and muscle pain and weakness in published literature (Decaudain et al., 2007); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Functional assays have contradictory findings on the effect of p.(L421P) on lamin A nucleus import in cell lines (Yang et al., 2013; Kiel et al., 2014), and suggest impairment of morphological and physiological features in patient cells, although quantitative analysis of lamin A expression was not described (Caron et al., 2007); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23977161, 24943589, 17711925, 32376792, 23853504, 17612587, 36354755, 10939567) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 29, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 03, 2022 | Variant summary: LMNA c.1262T>C (p.Leu421Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 250794 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1262T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals with LMNA-Related Disorders (examples: Caron_2007, Decaudain_2007, Carboni_2013, Lin_2020, and Volodarsky_2021). However, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with disease. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function demonstrated the variant had nuclear shape abnormalities, reduced proliferative activity, increased mitochondrial alterations, increased oxidative stress and premature cellular senescence (Caron_2007). Additional studies reported the variant does not impair trafficking of the protein (Decaudain_2007) and does not alter distribution of Nesprin-2 but shows reduced Nesprin-2 binding (Yang_2013). Furthermore, Kiel et al (2014) determined the variant has significantly reduced nuclear accumulation and exhibits altered subcellular localization and reduced lamina incorporation. However, this data does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect and how it relates to onset of laminopathies clinically. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=2) and likely pathogenic (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance until additional evidence of clinical importance becomes available. - |
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 19, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 421 of the lamin A/C proteins. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Experimental studies have shown that this variant causes accumulation of prelamin A and nuclear shape abnormalities (PMID: 17612587) and impacts the interaction with nesprin-2 (PMID: 23977161). However, clinical relevance of these observations is not clear. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with severe metabolic syndrome (PMID: 17711925), in an individual with laminopathy with musculoskeletal and metabolic phenotype (PMID: 23853504), in an individual with laminopathy with cardiac and metabolic phenotype (PMID: 23853504), and in an individual with suspected Charcot-Marie-Tooth (PMID: 32376792). This variant has been identified in 3/282158 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 09, 2022 | Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects LMNA function (PMID: 17612587, 23977161, 24943589). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C65"). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 66798). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of LMNA-related conditions (PMID: 17711925, 32376792). This variant is present in population databases (rs267607564, gnomAD 0.002%). This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 421 of the LMNA protein (p.Leu421Pro). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Nov 02, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 421 of the lamin A/C proteins. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Experimental studies have shown that this variant causes accumulation of prelamin A and nuclear shape abnormalities (PMID: 17612587) and impacts the interaction with nesprin-2 (PMID: 23977161). However, clinical relevance of these observations is not clear. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with severe metabolic syndrome (PMID: 17711925), in an individual with laminopathy with musculoskeletal and metabolic phenotype (PMID: 23853504), in an individual with laminopathy with cardiac and metabolic phenotype (PMID: 23853504), and in an individual with suspected Charcot-Marie-Tooth (PMID: 32376792). This variant has been identified in 3/282158 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 21, 2017 | The p.L421P variant (also known as c.1262T>C), located in coding exon 7 of the LMNA gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1262. The leucine at codon 421 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was detected in an individual from a metabolic syndrome cohort with central obesity, diabetes, hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (Decaudain A et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4835-44). Limited functional studies have suggested this variant may result in mild defects in lamin A intranuclear localization (Decaudain A et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4835-44; Yang L et al. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71850; Kiel T et al. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;53:271-80). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at