rs267608512
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.696C>T(p.Leu232=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000745 in 1,208,107 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 4 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | NM_001110792.2 | c.696C>T | p.Leu232= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000453960.7 | NP_001104262.1 | |
MECP2 | NM_004992.4 | c.660C>T | p.Leu220= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000303391.11 | NP_004983.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | ENST00000453960.7 | c.696C>T | p.Leu232= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001110792.2 | ENSP00000395535 | ||
MECP2 | ENST00000303391.11 | c.660C>T | p.Leu220= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004992.4 | ENSP00000301948 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000364 AC: 4AN: 109804Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000623 AC XY: 2AN XY: 32086
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000490 AC: 9AN: 183517Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000736 AC XY: 5AN XY: 67947
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000455 AC: 5AN: 1098254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 2AN XY: 363608
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000364 AC: 4AN: 109853Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0000622 AC XY: 2AN XY: 32145
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | RettBASE | Feb 18, 2008 | - - |
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Centre for Population Genomics, CPG | Aug 14, 2023 | This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0, this variant is classified as benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in 1000 Genomes is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1). Synonymous or intronic variant outside donor and acceptor splice regions where splicing prediction algorithms do not support significant splicing alteration (spliceAI score <=0.1) (BP4, BP7). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 18, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
MECP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 12, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at