rs2717482

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):c.6456G>A(p.Thr2152Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.93 in 1,487,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 644,104 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T2152T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.95 ( 68545 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.93 ( 575559 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.841

Publications

18 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]

OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOGL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.019).

BP6

Variant 12-80367685-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80367685-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226970.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.841 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.977 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	NM_001378609.3 link	c.6456G>A	p.Thr2152Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 54 of 59	ENST00000547103.7	NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOGL	ENST00000547103.7 link	c.6456G>A	p.Thr2152Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 54 of 59	5	NM_001378609.3	ENSP00000447211.2		Q3ZCN5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.948

AC:

144249

AN:

152094

Hom.:

68493

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.982

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.940

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.944

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.910

Gnomad EAS

AF:

1.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.947

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.973

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.854

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.924

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.938

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.942

AC:

133550

AN:

141818

AF XY:

0.938

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.984

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.955

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.895

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

1.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.970

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.918

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.921

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.928

AC:

1239245

AN:

1334918

Hom.:

575559

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.928

AC XY:

613494

AN XY:

660958

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.983

AC:

26943

AN:

27410

American (AMR)

AF:

0.953

AC:

23886

AN:

25052

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.903

AC:

18784

AN:

20794

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

1.00

AC:

35196

AN:

35202

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.947

AC:

64969

AN:

68594

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.970

AC:

48294

AN:

49776

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.857

AC:

4564

AN:

5326

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.921

AC:

965348

AN:

1047702

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.931

AC:

51261

AN:

55062

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

4064

8128

12191

16255

20319

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

20684

41368

62052

82736

103420

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.948

AC:

144358

AN:

152212

Hom.:

68545

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.951

AC XY:

70770

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.982

AC:

40795

AN:

41538

American (AMR)

AF:

0.944

AC:

14410

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.910

AC:

3159

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

1.00

AC:

5170

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.946

AC:

4570

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.973

AC:

10326

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.853

AC:

249

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.924

AC:

62838

AN:

68006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.939

AC:

1984

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

392

784

1177

1569

1961

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

912

1824

2736

3648

4560

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.935

Hom.:

35634

Bravo

AF:

0.948

Asia WGS

AF:

0.978

AC:

3391

AN:

3466

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Thr2143Thr in exon 53 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 7.9% (675/8584) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2717482). -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

5.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

0.84

PromoterAI

-0.0016

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over