rs2736982
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_014208.3(DSPP):c.897A>G(p.Ser299Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.615 in 1,613,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 307,067 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 32065 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.61 ( 275002 hom. )
Consequence
DSPP
NM_014208.3 synonymous
NM_014208.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0520
Publications
27 publications found
Genes affected
DSPP (HGNC:3054): (dentin sialophosphoprotein) This gene encodes a member of the small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoprotein (SIBLING) family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is secreted by odontoblasts and proteolytically processed to generate two principal proteins of the dentin extracellular matrix of the tooth, dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein. These two protein products may play distinct but related roles in dentin mineralization. Mutations in this gene are associated with dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia. This gene is present in a gene cluster on chromosome 4. Allelic differences due to repeat polymorphisms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
DSPP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- deafness, autosomal dominant 39, with dentinogenesis imperfecta 1Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- dentinogenesis imperfectaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- dentinogenesis imperfecta type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P
- dentinogenesis imperfecta type 3Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- dentin dysplasia type IInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- dentin dysplasia type IIInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 4-87613083-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-87613083-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260359.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.052 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.723 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSPP | ENST00000651931.1 | c.897A>G | p.Ser299Ser | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | NM_014208.3 | ENSP00000498766.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.647 AC: 98294AN: 151874Hom.: 32012 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
98294
AN:
151874
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.626 AC: 156098AN: 249262 AF XY: 0.621 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
156098
AN:
249262
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.612 AC: 894895AN: 1461830Hom.: 275002 Cov.: 81 AF XY: 0.611 AC XY: 444299AN XY: 727210 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
894895
AN:
1461830
Hom.:
Cov.:
81
AF XY:
AC XY:
444299
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
24799
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
26944
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
14905
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
25342
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
49875
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
36393
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
3891
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
675356
AN:
1111980
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
37390
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25689
51377
77066
102754
128443
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18288
36576
54864
73152
91440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.647 AC: 98399AN: 151992Hom.: 32065 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.646 AC XY: 48024AN XY: 74290 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
98399
AN:
151992
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
48024
AN XY:
74290
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
30220
AN:
41402
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
8911
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1936
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3548
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2819
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
7188
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
214
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
41721
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1363
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1792
3584
5376
7168
8960
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
798
1596
2394
3192
3990
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2294
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided
- -
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Nov 10, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Dentinogenesis imperfecta type 3 Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Denticles Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Dentinogenesis imperfecta type 2 Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Deafness, autosomal dominant 39, with dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.