rs273898682

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2286A>T(p.Arg762Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R762I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:7B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0130

Publications

34 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.060777485).

BP6

Variant 17-43093245-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093245-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 54522.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 link	c.2286A>T	p.Arg762Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 link	c.2286A>T	p.Arg762Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000135

AC:

AN:

251180

AF XY:

0.000177

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000267

AC:

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000371

AC XY:

AN XY:

727184

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000630

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000139

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53370

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111966

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000525

AC:

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00154

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000756

ExAC

AF:

0.000115

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:11

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Uncertain:3Benign:3

Aug 22, 2023

Mendelics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 14, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jun 18, 2019

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

Variant allele has low bioinformatic likelihood to encode a missense alteration affecting protein function (Missense prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND minor allele frequency 0.00166 (East Asian), derived from gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer (2019-05-13). -

Mar 19, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Jun 23, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals. Compound heterozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality. -

Sep 18, 2010

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 18, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2286A>T (p.Arg762Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 328564 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.2286A>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome or other cancers. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (benign/likely benign n=5, VUS n=5, expert panel benign). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jun 13, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Jun 11, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14973102, 30111351, 18627636, 25041116, 26852015, 18431501, 28222693, 23175448, 22116506, 28408614, 28961279, 27257965, 26530882, 29470806, 28664506, 30287823, 30702160, 30093976, 31477031) -

Aug 31, 2018

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Oct 07, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Breast neoplasm

Uncertain:1

Nov 01, 2015

Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA1 p.Arg762Ser variant was identified in 3 of 1862 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.002) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer (Cao 2013, Suter 2004, Thirthagiri 2008,Toh 2008) and was identified in 1 of 638 control chromosomes (frequency 0.002) from these studies. All probands from these studies were of Chinese or Malaysian descent. The variant was also identified the BIC database 3X as a variant with unknown clinical importance, and in the ClinVar database (classified with â€šÃ„Ãºunknown significanceâ€šÃ„Ã¹ by Ambry Genetics and BIC). The variant was listed in dbSNP (rs273898682) with a frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes project; one allele positive for variant), and in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database in 13 of 8654 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001502) from a population of East Asian individuals and in 1 of 16508 chromosomes from South Asian individuals. The low frequency observed in these cohorts is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Arg762 residue is conserved in mammals; however, the variant amino acid Serine (Ser) is present in both African clawed frog and purple sea urchin, increasing the likelihood that this variant may not have clinical significance. Computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein and Toh (2008) notes that this residue occurs outside of any known functional domain; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1

Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:literature only

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S

Benign:1

Mar 08, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.28

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.030

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.61

D;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.18

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.36

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.15

LIST_S2

Benign

0.68

T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.51

MetaRNN

Benign

0.061

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.22

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.0

M;M;.;.;.

PhyloP100

0.013

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.8

D;D;D;D;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.81

Sift

Uncertain

0.0060

D;D;D;D;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.19

B;.;.;D;.

Vest4

0.55

MutPred

0.47

Gain of phosphorylation at R762 (P = 0.0103);Gain of phosphorylation at R762 (P = 0.0103);.;Gain of phosphorylation at R762 (P = 0.0103);.;

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.36

ClinPred

0.38

GERP RS

2.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Varity_R

0.35

gMVP

0.25

Mutation Taster

=2/98

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over