rs273902788
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4BP5_StrongBP7_Strong
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.81-11del variant is an intronic variant occurring in intron 2 of the BRCA1 gene. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset) but is below the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold >0.00002 for BS1_Supporting (PM2_Supporting, BS1, and BA1 are not met). This BRCA1 intronic variant is outside of the native donor and acceptor 1,2 splice sites, and SpliceAI predictor score of 0.00 suggests that the variant has no impact on splicing (score threshold <0.10) (BP4 met). This is an intronic variant, and mRNA experimental analysis indicates no impact on splicing (PMID:21735045), considered strong evidence against pathogenicity (BP7_Strong (RNA)). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.00131 (based on Co-occurrence LR=0.0406; Family History LR=0.0321), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; (PMID:17924331)).In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA1-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BP4, BP7_Strong (RNA), BP5_Very strong). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA003895/MONDO:0011450/092
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.0000395  AC: 6AN: 151924Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.0000363  AC: 9AN: 248152 AF XY:  0.0000373   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.0000528  AC: 77AN: 1459420Hom.:  0  Cov.: 30 AF XY:  0.0000455  AC XY: 33AN XY: 725902 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.0000395  AC: 6AN: 151924Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.0000674  AC XY: 5AN XY: 74196 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1    Uncertain:1Benign:3 
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified    Benign:3 
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.81-11delT alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: One predict the variant abolishes the canonical 3' splicing acceptor site. Three predict the variant no significant impact on splicing. An in vitro assay using RNA from the individual(s) carrying this variant shows that the variant had no effect on splicing (example, Menendez_2011). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.6e-05 in 248152 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.81-11delT has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer without a strong evidence of causality (example, Judkins_2005, Easton_2007, Menendez_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (BRCA2 c.9117+2T>C), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multifactorial probability models also support a neutral outcome (example, Lindor_2012). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome    Benign:3 
- -
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2    Uncertain:1 
- -
BRCA1-related cancer predisposition    Benign:1 
The c.81-11del variant is an intronic variant occurring in intron 2 of the BRCA1 gene. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset) but is below the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold >0.00002 for BS1_Supporting (PM2_Supporting, BS1, and BA1 are not met). This BRCA1 intronic variant is outside of the native donor and acceptor 1,2 splice sites, and SpliceAI predictor score of 0.00 suggests that the variant has no impact on splicing (score threshold <0.10) (BP4 met). This is an intronic variant, and mRNA experimental analysis indicates no impact on splicing (PMID: 21735045), considered strong evidence against pathogenicity (BP7_Strong (RNA)). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.00131 (based on Co-occurrence LR=0.0406; Family History LR=0.0321), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; (PMID: 17924331)). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA1-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BP4, BP7_Strong (RNA), BP5_Very strong). -
not provided    Benign:1 
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27616075, 17924331, 21990134) -
Malignant tumor of breast    Benign:1 
The BRCA1 c.81-11del variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was also identified in ClinVar (6x, Benign by ENIGMA, Invitae, Color; Likely benign by Lab Corp and SCRP; Uncertain by BIC), or LOVD 3.0 (3x as benign). The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 11 of 279514 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 24716 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), Latino in 2 of 34920 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), European (Non-Finnish) in 6 of 127620 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), South Asian in 1 of 30012 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and Finish populations. Menendez et al. report an in vitro assay using RNA from lymphocyte cell cultures form a patient carrying this variant displaying that the variant had no effect on splicing (Menendez 2011). In addition Lindor et al. report a probability model that predicts this variant to be benign (Lindor 2012). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at