rs280520
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003331.5(TYK2):c.1477-6T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.249 in 1,591,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51,487 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003331.5 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYK2 | NM_003331.5 | c.1477-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000525621.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYK2 | ENST00000525621.6 | c.1477-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_003331.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.281 AC: 42697AN: 151858Hom.: 6396 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.264 AC: 56952AN: 216126Hom.: 7863 AF XY: 0.264 AC XY: 30783AN XY: 116784
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.246 AC: 353344AN: 1439048Hom.: 45071 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.247 AC XY: 175862AN XY: 713318
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.281 AC: 42773AN: 151978Hom.: 6416 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.284 AC XY: 21070AN XY: 74274
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Nov 12, 2023 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 43% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 41. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Immunodeficiency 35 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at