rs280521
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003331.5(TYK2):c.1368-59C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.146 in 1,429,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,395 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2401 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 13994 hom. )
Consequence
TYK2
NM_003331.5 intron
NM_003331.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.28
Genes affected
TYK2 (HGNC:12440): (tyrosine kinase 2) This gene encodes a member of the tyrosine kinase and, more specifically, the Janus kinases (JAKs) protein families. This protein associates with the cytoplasmic domain of type I and type II cytokine receptors and promulgate cytokine signals by phosphorylating receptor subunits. It is also a component of both the type I and type III interferon signaling pathways. As such, it may play a role in anti-viral immunity. A mutation in this gene has been associated with Immunodeficiency 35. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
?
Variant 19-10362716-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10362716-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 673299.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.255 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYK2 | NM_003331.5 | c.1368-59C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000525621.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYK2 | ENST00000525621.6 | c.1368-59C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_003331.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.168 AC: 25506AN: 151970Hom.: 2392 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
25506
AN:
151970
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.143 AC: 183058AN: 1277144Hom.: 13994 AF XY: 0.143 AC XY: 90721AN XY: 634604
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
183058
AN:
1277144
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
90721
AN XY:
634604
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.168 AC: 25547AN: 152090Hom.: 2401 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.165 AC XY: 12264AN XY: 74354
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
25547
AN:
152090
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
12264
AN XY:
74354
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
354
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Nov 12, 2023 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 21% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 20. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 19, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at