rs28360457
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002562.6(P2RX7):c.920G>A(p.Arg307Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0135 in 1,599,356 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 197 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002562.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2RX7 | NM_002562.6 | c.920G>A | p.Arg307Gln | missense_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000328963.10 | NP_002553.3 | |
LOC105370032 | XR_001749352.3 | n.327+28072C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2RX7 | ENST00000328963.10 | c.920G>A | p.Arg307Gln | missense_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_002562.6 | ENSP00000330696 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0104 AC: 1576AN: 151794Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00856 AC: 2152AN: 251470Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00861 AC XY: 1170AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0138 AC: 19936AN: 1447446Hom.: 185 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0133 AC XY: 9621AN XY: 720982
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0104 AC: 1576AN: 151910Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 750AN XY: 74254
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at